|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Interesting IR sensor test results
Most IR remotes use one of three frequencies; 36, 38, and 40 KHz. But their light outputs are all the same IR; the sensor will see them all.
IR remotes and their receivers use different codes, not different frequencies. If you're sending one code while someone else is sending another, the chances of either one getting through without errors is very small. Try this at home: Hold the button on one remote (VCR?) and then try to use another (TV?). Very seldom will it work. There will be up to six robocoaches operating signaling devices during the Hybrid period. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Interesting IR sensor test results
I know for one of my college classes we had to make an IR receiver transmitter for a robot we were using and we could control the frequency at which we broadcasted the signal and would just make a good enough filter so that the phototransistors would only see close to this frequency. If you are allowed to do something like this you would get no interference from anyone else (as long as there not on the same frequency but you can ask them and can change your's accordingly if your setup allows it)
I haven't read the specifics of what your allowed to use but this consists of a simple IR LED's and some phototransistors which I don't think are against the rules. I am also not on a team anymore so I haven't seen the receiver board or any spec sheets for it. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Interesting IR sensor test results
Quote:
Do you think this would something you could/would build around the exisiting IR board and receiver that where given to us? kind of like a filtering shield that only lets in the frequency that you will be transmitting? |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Interesting IR sensor test results
Did you press the same button on the remote that you were jamming it with (i.e. play and play)? We haven't started playing with our IR board, but I was curious as to whether the selection of the buttons would affect the effectiveness of the board, i.e. if we picked obscure buttons, our signal would work better. Thanks for posting your testing results! I find it very interesting that it works for 360 degrees, most receivers apparently aren't good for over a 100 degree span.
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Interesting IR sensor test results
Quote:
Yea that's what I was trying to say although i have no idea if that is possible with the given board. Someone else that's actually working with this thing will have to say. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Interesting IR sensor test results
i dont know all that much about IR but what kind of "filter" would you use that blocks all other frequencies but one?
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Interesting IR sensor test results
You don't block all frequencies but one (if you could do that simply then you would be making alot of money) but with some combination of low pass and high pass filters you can get a nice bandpass of filters centered around where you are transmitting. Do a wikipedia search on filters and try to get through it. All of the stuff I've learned about is college level engineering so it might not be the easiest thing to understand.
There are also several types of active filters as well that have a sharper "edge" to them on their bode plot. (a magnitude vs. frequency plot). |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Interesting IR sensor test results
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: Robostang's Analog Sensor test software | Robostang 548 | Extra Discussion | 11 | 23-12-2007 09:55 |
| Battery Life, 50A load discharge test method/results | Dale(294engr] | Electrical | 5 | 22-01-2006 09:14 |
| AP test results | RudimentaryPeni | Chit-Chat | 29 | 19-07-2004 18:06 |
| How do we Test our Beacon and Sensor | Matthew_H | Technical Discussion | 7 | 07-02-2004 15:42 |
| Results of traction test | IBApril180 | Technical Discussion | 3 | 04-01-2003 18:56 |