|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Dual Robots
No, you are not allowed to intentional detach or remove objects from your robot in any way during the competition. This includes a secondary robot.
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Dual Robots
Not during the competition play, in the pits between matches.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Dual Robots
I took our ramp off last year in the pits before the elimination so that we could see better to hang ringers and we had a ramp bot on our alliance. I think that as long as it was on when it was inspected that it can be taken off, just not detached on the field.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Dual Robots
As was mentioned, you would need to be re-inspected if you were to do this and the modular parts do count towards your 120lbs limit. Could be wrong but I'm pretty sure tahts what the rule is
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Dual Robots
That's my understanding: It's legal, but ALL of the parts of all configurations need to weight under 120 pounds. Read <R12> for a good example.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Dual Robots
We did not have to reinspect because the ramp was on during the first inspection and meet all guidelines and they said that we only removed an attachment and did not add anything that was not on during inspection.
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Dual Robots
The plan is to have it all as one bot, then remove as needed before matches, all work being done in the pits. We also removed somethings last year and were told that we did not need it reinspected, I would assume it would fly this year also.
We would have it all weigh in as one bot though, with all the parts being on the starter bot being inspected. Chris McKenzie 2186 |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Dual Robots
Quote:
As long as you started with one bot that passed inspection and removed mechanisms before matches, I don't see why it wouldn't work. Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Dual Robots
If you guys do end up doing this, I have got to see it. Any chance of a tour at VCU?
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Dual Robots
Detaching significant parts of a robot is legal as long as any/all parts used weighed under 120lbs. This year I could easily see removing your hurdler and ball recovery mechanisms to get fast and agile. Especially if your two alliance partners were the best hurdlers at the regional. Last year I saw many robots that had damaged manipulators that ran without the manipulators while they were being repaired.
To have a smaller and larger robot could be difficult, no impossible, to have both meet all the standards, i.e. bumpers, flag holder, RC, battery. I have seen watercraft that attach to a smaller PWC to make small boat that can carry six to eight people. If you had a self contained small robot and then built a larger fully functional, all the bells and whistles robot around it that could be removed, could be very interesting. As long as both together weighed 120lbs or less. Post a video and GOOD LUCK! |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Dual Robots
We had a similar idea last year. We made a ramp that didn't move but inside it was a small bot that could be taken out and used to play defense. As far as we knew it was all legal.
|
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Dual Robots
We are going to VCU, so if you are there, check us out.
After futher dicussions it has been pretty well set that it will essentially be an elec. board on wheels. Now we are trying to figure out the bumpers. How to get it past the wheelie bar... Chris McKenzie 2186 |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Dual Robots
If I understand you correctly, you're talking about making a mini-robot, and then an entire shell around it that can do other parts of the game, and would act as an attachment. As long as
a) all configurations combined meet the 120lb weight limit b) the sub-robot passes as a full FRC robot, and all the attachments are only attachments b) you choose which configuration you use before the match, and can never switch between them in the match |
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Dual Robots
Quote:
If you make a base or "chassis" that has your drive train and everything that makes it legal on it, and you have a arm that is easy to detach in the pits, then you can take it off and run the base. Since your really can't push other robots around this year, the loss of the extra arm weight won't hurt you as much, which is what you are really after. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Are FIRST robots actually robots? | EHaskins | General Forum | 39 | 14-12-2006 21:40 |
| Dual fields | Keith Chester | Rumor Mill | 11 | 05-04-2005 17:57 |
| pic: 716 Dual Motor/Dual Speed | CD47-Bot | Robot Showcase | 18 | 23-04-2004 01:51 |
| White Paper Discuss: Dual-motor, dual-speed gearbox | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 8 | 05-04-2004 19:24 |
| White Paper Discuss: Dual-motor, dual-speed drive transmission design | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 9 | 03-09-2003 10:40 |