|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Defense, It's still here.
I got a question.
Since they have removed the 6' height restriction in the opponents home stretch, does that mean teams can block hirdling attempts? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Defense, It's still here.
It should have no effect on the hurdle protection rule. A hurdle attempt can only be done in your own homezone.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Defense, It's still here.
Someone is in denial.
Lets face it, there is less defense this year. Last year, harassing a star scorer was quite worthwhile if you had a decent drivetrain. <G42> is unequivocal about not harassing hurdlers. <G29> prohibits POSSESSION of opponents trackballs. Therefore playing keepaway will be difficult. The best chance is to herd opponents trackballs whenever the chance presents itself. Basically, give it a shove in the wrong direction whenever you see it. This is slim pickings. It remains to be seen how the judges will view deliberately moving in front of herding robot. /Jason |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Defense, It's still here.
Quote:
Code:
POSSESSION: Controlling the position and movement of a TRACKBALL while the TRACKBALL is supported or captured by an ALLIANCE shall be considered POSSESSION of the TRACKBALL. A TRACKBALL shall be considered “supported” by a ROBOT if in the estimation of a reasonably astute observer the majority of the weight of the TRACKBALL is being borne by the ROBOT. A TRACKBALL shall be considered “captured” by a ROBOT if, as the ROBOT moves or changes orientation (e.g. backs up or spins in place), the TRACKBALL remains in approximately the same position relative to the ROBOT. Both the “supported” and “captured” conditions include the case where the TRACKBALL is also in contact with the floor. Code:
<G29> POSSESSING Opponent’s TRACKBALLS - ROBOTS may not be in the POSSESSION of a TRACKBALL belonging to an opposing ALLIANCE. A PENALTY will be assigned for each violation. HERDING of an opponent’s TRACKBALL and removing an opponent’s TRACKBALL from the OVERPASS is permitted. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Defense, It's still here.
Trust me, If you think that there will be no defense this year, you are mistaken.
THis game is designed so that defense is going to be played at the same time as offense. Robots the are just boxes on wheels are going to be effective and i figure that they will be able to make or break a match in qualifying. There are teams that will make a strategy to play defense and be VERY effective. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Defense, It's still here.
Quote:
If you have a robot that takes a while to pick up a trackball an opposing robot, say... a box on wheels... could "bump to pass" just enough to make them have to realign themselves again, while the box on wheels keeps going around the track, scoring points. Hopefully the robot doesn't take to long to position them selves and grab the trackball or the box on wheels could keep this up the whole match, while scoring points for their alliance. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Defense, It's still here.
Defense now becomes much more challenging after Update 2
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Defense, It's still here.
I don't see how it is harder, unless you planned on aggressively attacking your opponents' Trackball while they were Hurdling.
Our team has discussed defense and I think that the rules have been laid out to encourage teamwork (sharing balls with your allies) and discourage heavy defense (an improvement over last year, where slamming a robot into the Rack, often entangling it, was just fine - I never saw it called). Defnitely, the defense this year will be way more creative this year than last year, where the push-the-robot-halfway-across-the-field-and-never-stop strategy was the one that was the only truely effective one (at least, the only widely used effective one). In my brief experience as a base driver during off-seasons, it is way more fun to play effective defense than it is to score because it is a mental challenge between you and your opponent. We will have to see how the game turns out - as it could be in any number of ways, but I definitely foresee a copious amount of defense (you have to have at least one ally without a Trackball do something) even if it is not really intense. A lot also rests in the hands of the Referees, of course. Last edited by IbleedPink233 : 01-13-2008 at 02:32 PM. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Defense, It's still here.
heres a semi-stupid question
are you allowed to pick up the opposing teams ball and launch it backwards?![]() |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Defense, It's still here.
Quote:
You may, however, simply knock it backwards. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Defense, It's still here.
whoever said there is no defence this year is stupid there are actually some good defecive teams out there
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Defense, It's still here.
Quote:
Yes, there are good "defective" robots out there, but then, they are no longer so defective. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Defense, It's still here.
Did anyone see the defense in the elimination rounds at the NYC regional? The semifinal matches in particular (the ones with team 694). They were amazingly aggressive and were not flagged at all in the first match and not very much in the third match.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Defense, It's still here.
I have a funny felling that this year is going to be alot like '05 where yes you could play some defense if you wanted to, but the opportunity for penalties is just too high. It really just depends on how the refs manage the game and basically outlaw any major interaction with scoring robots.
|
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Defense, It's still here.
I think, perhaps with the sole exception of overt contact of a hurdling robot, defense is completely proper and viable.
I mentioned in another thread the potential, with <G36> absent, to erect a wall in front of or behind your opponent's overpass such that hurdling is impossible. Coupled with a drive that allowed you to move sideways, you could become very effective at blocking hurdling attempts while never contacting the opposing robots at all. I cannot imagine how at any time contact initiated by their robot could result in a penalty upon your team. That notion is ludicrous. Further, despite rules about "bumping to pass," there are no specific prohibitions against gently escorting robots in one direction or another. I understand and appreciate that there are rules governing behavior in attempts to pass on the field, but those rules do not preclude me from having no intention to pass and acting accordingly. I think we'll see more defense than a lot of folks think, but I don't know that there are many viable strategies that for defense that might require a robot design different than something designed to score. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| It's HERE! Sparky384.com Store Now Online | Joe Matt | Chit-Chat | 3 | 01-19-2004 10:35 AM |
| Mac Programmers be happy! It's finally here! | MacZealot | Programming | 42 | 08-25-2003 11:32 AM |
| anyone still here? | Greg Needel | General Forum | 29 | 02-17-2003 11:53 AM |
| It's kinda lonely down here | Kevin Watson | Math and Science | 1 | 12-27-2002 08:53 PM |
| Yes, I'm still here... | archiver | 2000 | 0 | 06-23-2002 11:04 PM |