|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2008 and drivetrains
Yea my team in 2003 had 2 steered casters in the front with a 4 wheel drive in the back, it worked pretty well but there were a couple of things i would have changed, and yes you could really fly while turning which was pretty cool.
I can also remember several teams that have employed some kind of steering, obviously all the crab drives, but 16 baxter bomb squad a couple years ago had a tricycle setup with all 3 wheels driven and 1 steered, worked very well from what I remember. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2008 and drivetrains
Heh, this is EXACTLY what happened to us last year - we couldn't drive our own robot! Loks like we're gonna be doing two powered wheels in front, two powered omnis in the back, tank drive, so we can 'drift' around the corners.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2008 and drivetrains
Before you lock on that drive, think hard about the 'drift'... it wont be pleasant.
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2008 and drivetrains
I really think a well designed Ackerman system is the way to go.
I'm lobbying my teammates for: - Ackermann - Rack & Pinion Steering - 2 Speed Single Power Plant - Limited slip differential I already have a differential design that is fairly easy to make (I'm currently working on reducing the weight a little) and I like the AM SuperShifter. We're looking at various RC car designs for some practical solutions. ![]() |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2008 and drivetrains
I don't know. If you're going to go Ackerman you'd better have a good turning radius and some good programming for your controllers. It seems to me that there is a lot of space open on the field (each lane is 13 feet wide) but I also think that there's going to be a lot of robot crowding, especially when robots are extended. It seems to me that Ackerman would be difficult to steer precisely when it's on the opposite side of the field; especially with trackballs that are so big they could potentially completely block the view of your robot. The other issue I forsee is a difficulty in turning around unless you intend to be using reverse (another adventure in steering with Ackerman). I'm not saying it can't be done but it will take a lot of practice for the drivers to get good and precise with their steering considering they have a fixed point of reference instead of one on the object (like in a car).
In either case, it will be very interesting to see what drive trains everyone is using. We're thinking of a 6-wheel drive for this year; power when you need it, maneuverability when you need it. |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2008 and drivetrains
Programming should be fairly simple, a pid loop to control steering angle and the Y-Axis direct to the powerplant (ok maybe a rate limiter). I don't see the complexity. Am I missing something?
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2008 Offseason event MARC being moved to JUNE 28, 2008 | Steve Ketron | Off-Season Events | 10 | 21-03-2008 07:55 |
| Prepping for 2008: Awards, Bandsaws, and Perspective | Rich Kressly | General Forum | 16 | 11-02-2008 10:25 |
| CMU and 2008 | King Duke | Programming | 14 | 29-01-2008 21:30 |
| Chiaphua Drivetrains | sanddrag | Motors | 9 | 13-08-2002 12:25 |
| Drivetrains | archiver | 2001 | 14 | 23-06-2002 22:52 |