Team Update #2

[Thexder]

Posted 11 January 2008: http://www.usfirst.org/community/frc...nt.aspx?id=450


What to say about it?

Section 10.2.8.1
The 2008 Trackballs require some care in assembly and inflation. Each Trackball consists of two parts: a Bladder and a Cover. The bladder has a 120cm diameter and is made of 2500g PVC.

[jgannon]

Originally Posted by Thexder

Section 10.2.8.1
The 2008 Trackballs require some care in assembly and inflation. Each Trackball consists of two parts: a Bladder and a Cover. The bladder has a 120cm diameter and is made of 2500g PVC.

Is this as much of a bombshell to everyone else as it is to me? Section 6.3 says the balls are approximately 40", and ours came up a couple inches short even with the help of the compressor. 120cm is more than 47"... I'd think this would make a HUGE difference for a lot of designs, both in terms of the size of your gripper, and how much this thing is going to bounce if you stretch it out 20% more. I'm hoping to see this re-clarified soon.

[ay2b]

I like that they clarified that disabled robots may be pushed out of the path of travel without penalty. This was a point of discussion on one of the threads here.

I dislike that they reused <G36>. The OLD <G36> was the height restriction on robots in the opponent's home stretch. Update 1 said <G36> has been removed. Update 2 says <G36> disabled robots may be pushed out of the way w/o penalty. I think that <G36> should have simply been gone, and the new rule should have gotten a new number, rather than reusing the number.

<G38> and <G40> regarding impeding a robot and "bumping to pass" are now only applicable during teleoperated mode. I think this is good, because I think no team would be attempting to implement a "bump to pass" during autonomous. It also opens up some potential defensive strategies which have been discussed elsewhere (i.e. blocking during the hybrid mode).

<G42> now applies the protection of a robot in the process of hurdling to both the robot and the trackball.

The inspection checklist has had "Robot Class" removed -- this was obviously just left in when copying from last year.

<T15> should make qualification matches go a little faster. During elimination matches, the higher seeded alliance can position their robots after the lower seeded alliance positions their robots; during qualification matches, alliances position their robots simultaneously.

[Madison]

Originally Posted by jgannon

Is this as much of a bombshell to everyone else as it is to me? Section 6.3 says the balls are approximately 40", and ours came up a couple inches short even with the help of the compressor. 120cm is more than 47"... I'd think this would make a HUGE difference for a lot of designs, both in terms of the size of your gripper, and how much this thing is going to bounce if you stretch it out 20% more. I'm hoping to see this re-clarified soon.

The source provided by FIRST for additional trackballs, www.sportogo.com, does not sell 120cm balls, only 102cm (40") balls. I think we just have a typo here.

Also, on that note, I don't see any balls with plain blue or red covers. They're all some sort of hyper-large sports ball and they're all really expensive.

[dez250]

The shells are a special order for FIRST. The bladder can be purchased on its own through Sportogo for $20.50. If you want a second ball completely with shell and bladder, it will be a quite bit more.

[jgannon]

Originally Posted by dez250

The shells are a special order for FIRST. The bladder can be purchased on its own through Sportogo for $20.50. If you want a second ball completely with shell and bladder, it will be a quite bit more.

Is there a typo in the weight in Team Update #2, too? The update says that the bladder is supposed to be 2500g, whereas the one in your link is only 2200g.

[dez250]

Originally Posted by jgannon

Is there a typo in the weight in Team Update #2, too? The update says that the bladder is supposed to be 2500g, whereas the one in your link is only 2200g.

I noticed that after i posted the link. I am going to try to verify that the bladder was not different than this one and repost when i can verify correctly.

[cbudrecki]

Why can't FIRST provide a manufacturer and Part #? This would ensure that everyone gets the proper ball. I did notice last weekend that there was a 40" ball and a 120cm ball mentioned, perhaps you buy the 120cm and only fill it to 40" (i.e., just enough to fill the cover)?

[Richard Wallace]

Originally Posted by tb222

Why can't FIRST provide a manufacturer and Part #? This would ensure that everyone gets the proper ball. I did notice last weekend that there was a 40" ball and a 120cm ball mentioned, perhaps you buy the 120cm and only fill it to 40" (i.e., just enough to fill the cover)?

FIRST already ensured that every team received the proper ball, by including one in the kit.

[SSMike]

I personally like the new <G36> because it doesn't incur a penalty on a robot that has been disabled and cannot move. A penalty would just add insult to injury.

[Sunshine]

There is absolutely no way that the balls are 47". The cover that came with them would burst at the seams.

[Sunshine]

Originally Posted by SSMike

I personally like the new <G36> because it doesn't incur a penalty on a robot that has been disabled and cannot move. A penalty would just add insult to injury.

But, doesn't that mean that if a team panics and forgets to push the E-Stop Button they get penalized

[Pat McCarthy]

Originally Posted by Sunshine

But, doesn't that mean that if a team panics and forgets to push the E-Stop Button they get penalized

If it is obvious that there is a problem to the refs, and your team is freaking out, the refs will most likely remind you about the E-stop if at all possible. It may come as a surprise, but refs really don't want to give penalties if they are preventable.

[Bharat Nain]

Robots can be disabled from the field also. I am sure if it is a safety hazard someone behind the table will pull the plug.

[SSMike]

Originally Posted by Pat McCarthy

If it is obvious that there is a problem to the refs, and your team is freaking out, the refs will most likely remind you about the E-stop if at all possible. It may come as a surprise, but refs really don't want to give penalties if they are preventable.

[/notsarcasm]Yeah refs are usually very good at reminding you of these things to prevent penalties.[not sarcasm]
I don't see them having to remind too many teams though. If you tip over and can't go back, the drivers should then know what to do.