|
|
|
 That is why I think that the Chairman's Award is better. You can have a great robot and something weird happen to your alliance and you are out. If you have a great team and win the Chairman's Award you are in the Hall of Fame forever. - WEHickok [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#5
13-01-2008, 20:27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Filtering out Vibration while using a KOP Accelerometer
Thanks for the advice. What do you guys think about taking the derivative of the acceleration and if it's too high just throwing the data over again. (I guess that's kind of a filter too, in a way)
I don't use a timer-based interrupt as I first planned, but am instead using the timer function in easy C to measure the time difference between calls... The timer is then reset to 0 to start the next time period. I'll post our data a little later, I don't have it on my computer, it's on the robotics one. I've read the spec sheet, but if I end up using a filter as they suggest, won't it take out things like the robot crashing into the wall and stuff like that. That would change the acceleration really fast. I mean, I can't assume I'm not going to hit anything in autonomous (hybrid) mode. What bandwidth would you suggest? Last edited by joshyboy9987 : 13-01-2008 at 20:38. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| EMI Filtering | Mike Betts | Electrical | 1 | 06-03-2007 15:38 |
| Using camera PWM out | Cuog | Programming | 2 | 28-11-2005 14:17 |
| Hall effect sensor Filtering | magical hands | Programming | 5 | 13-02-2005 11:23 |
| Content Filtering | FRANK(WGH) | IT / Communications | 1 | 23-10-2004 09:21 |
| Using Accelerometer with '04 controller | sanddrag | Control System | 4 | 20-02-2004 12:18 |
Threaded Mode