|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Q&A response - new interpretation of R16
From Q&A answers:
The rule states that the Robot may not have any two points more than 80 inches apart when measured horizontally. The parenthetical phrase is intended as a clarifying example, but it does not convey the same authority as the rule. It is recognized that a small set of configurations exist (with an equilateral triangle with 80 inch sides as the degenerate case) that are in compliance with the letter of the rule, but may violate the example. In all such cases the rule, and not the example, will be enforced. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Penalty re: <R16> | GaryVoshol | Rules/Strategy | 4 | 10-01-2008 15:56 |
| R16 Playing Configuration | skimoose | Rules/Strategy | 11 | 07-01-2008 09:18 |
| Senator Response re:FIRST & the state budget | Brandon Martus | Announcements | 2 | 03-11-2007 16:45 |
| New Bumper rule interpretation - straight from the lead inspector | Gary Dillard | Rules/Strategy | 17 | 12-03-2007 14:56 |
| Update 6 Q&A # 132 ... INTERPRETATION PLEASE!!!! | archiver | 2001 | 2 | 24-06-2002 00:26 |