|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Q&A response - new interpretation of R16
Dave, read Eric's post again. He's saying that the bounding box is a square, but your robot must fit in it in ANY orientation. If you can fit such a square regardless of your orientation, then you are within <R16>. If there is some orientation such that you don't fit, then you are violating <R16>. As such, Eric's definition is precisely <R16>.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Penalty re: <R16> | GaryVoshol | Rules/Strategy | 4 | 10-01-2008 15:56 |
| R16 Playing Configuration | skimoose | Rules/Strategy | 11 | 07-01-2008 09:18 |
| Senator Response re:FIRST & the state budget | Brandon Martus | Announcements | 2 | 03-11-2007 16:45 |
| New Bumper rule interpretation - straight from the lead inspector | Gary Dillard | Rules/Strategy | 17 | 12-03-2007 14:56 |
| Update 6 Q&A # 132 ... INTERPRETATION PLEASE!!!! | archiver | 2001 | 2 | 24-06-2002 00:26 |