|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Q&A response - new interpretation of R16
Quote:
like MIT's Giant Slide Rule, but enough threadjacking for me. I just couldn't get the image of a team of Robot Inspectors wielding giant calipers out of my head. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Q&A response - new interpretation of R16
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Q&A response - new interpretation of R16
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Penalty re: <R16> | GaryVoshol | Rules/Strategy | 4 | 10-01-2008 15:56 |
| R16 Playing Configuration | skimoose | Rules/Strategy | 11 | 07-01-2008 09:18 |
| Senator Response re:FIRST & the state budget | Brandon Martus | Announcements | 2 | 03-11-2007 16:45 |
| New Bumper rule interpretation - straight from the lead inspector | Gary Dillard | Rules/Strategy | 17 | 12-03-2007 14:56 |
| Update 6 Q&A # 132 ... INTERPRETATION PLEASE!!!! | archiver | 2001 | 2 | 24-06-2002 00:26 |