|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Gyro vs Dead Reckoning
Finally! We are almost done as it is!
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Gyro vs Dead Reckoning
Our team purchased an ADXRS150 from Spark Fun electronics for two reasons:
(1) It is 180 degrees/sec instead of the 80 degrees/sec one that came in the kit. (2) It works with Kevin Watson's gyro code and with WPILib, but the one in the KoP works with neither. However, we've been having some problems with the accuracy of the sensor. Nevertheless, using a gyro is definitely better than dead reckoning. If you use timers or something, a slight change in battery voltage may affect your times. If you use loop count, adding more code will increase the time per loop. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Simple dead-reckoning autonomous | JimGRobot | Programming | 16 | 16-05-2007 23:59 |
| Autonomous: CMUCam or dead reckoning? | Andrew Blair | Rules/Strategy | 18 | 26-02-2005 19:36 |
| dead reckoning | st28 | Programming | 1 | 24-02-2004 11:34 |
| Dead Reckoning | Ryan Cumings | Programming | 3 | 24-02-2004 10:57 |
| A DEAD reckoning program | rcubes85 | Programming | 5 | 19-03-2003 14:21 |