|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1726 Prototype Testing
oh man that catapult is BEAST
what did you use to power the catapult? I cant really tell, but is ure robot within the 28 by 38 requirement ? Last edited by neoshaakti : 26-01-2008 at 21:43. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 1726 Prototype Testing
Best one I have see so far! That's great!
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 1726 Prototype Testing
Quote:
Right now we're working on lowering the air consumption (right now a single shot drops our pressure from 115psi to about 80psi...) And yes, I believe it is within the limits... However, this is a culmination of 2 prototypes, a mechanism mounting bracket, and last year's robot. The real thing will (hopefully) be much nicer |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1726 Prototype Testing
Quote:
sorry Im a nub |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 1726 Prototype Testing
basically when the catapult is fully retracted, the cylinder sticks out 3 in. Before we shoot, we hold down the ball (from the top, we still have to make that part) and open the valve. Air from the tanks fills up that 3in. and we wait until it is time to fire. When we fire, we remove the top piece and the air inside the cylinders expands rapidly, launching the ball.
Maybe I should make a quick diagram... |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1726 Prototype Testing
Quote:
yeah a diagram might help... |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1726 Prototype Testing
Think of it like a spring, but instead of energy being stored in the coils, its stored in the cylinder with the air. Only reason that it sticks out 3in is so the pressure can build, storing the energy.
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 1726 Prototype Testing
Quote:
Here's a diagram (out of proportion and not quite right, but what the hay): ![]() |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1726 Prototype Testing
Quote:
do u have to program the bore to protrude 3 " out, or do u mechanically set block it from full retracting (Im guessing the 2nd...programming a bore doesnt seem probable) haha |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1726 Prototype Testing
Are you at all worried about running out of air?
I think you might hurdle too fast ( ) and drain your tanks. |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 1726 Prototype Testing
actually, yes, we are very worried about running out of air! Right now we lose about 35-40psi per shot, and it takes ~25-30 seconds to reload... Of course, you don't have to shoot it at 115psi, but we still plan on exploring different ways to conserve air.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1726 Prototype Testing
Well, you could start by removing all the other pistons.
Use servos to shift, and a motor to lift the loading forks. Pressurizing your tanks before every match might help maximize your air. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1726 Prototype Testing
We hold the cylinders at 3in by using the weight of the ball combined with the piece (not yet built) which holds down the ball. Because of the geometry of the catapult it takes very little force to hold it down, but increases exponentially when released.
We are trying to cut down air usage and have been somewhat successful. Almost all of our cylinders are now single action instead of double action. By doing this we have cut air consumption for one shot from about 115-70 to 115-90 psi drop on four tanks (about 15 sec recharge time). If we start with the tanks precharged we should be able to get through a match without too much trouble. On a side note does anyone know if it's possible to design a pressure readout display for the OI. I think that would be immensely helpful this year. |
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 1726 Prototype Testing
Quote:
Now, perhaps, I can return the favour, by suggesting that the device you are looking for is called a "pressure transducer" and that a quick search of the forums here brings up a link to here where you can see a picture of one that was apparently in the 2006 KOP. It's possible you have one sitting in your shop and don't know of it! As for sending the data back and displaying it, I suspect your programming team is on top of how to send it, and perhaps someone is building a custom dashboard in labview? Thanks again... I feel so much more confident with our design knowing that our calculations are not entirely off-base! Jason |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1726 Prototype Testing
Quote:
From what I understand they didn't optimize the shooting system at all; it really only needs to fill the initial 3", not all 10". That should save a ton of air for the other tasks. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: FRC 1726 Steering Prototype | MrForbes | Extra Discussion | 15 | 12-01-2008 21:21 |
| pic: 1726 Promobot | GUI | Extra Discussion | 18 | 01-11-2007 18:04 |
| pic: 1726 Demo Bot | s_forbes | Extra Discussion | 6 | 27-06-2007 12:56 |
| pic: 1726 Ramp Progress | s_forbes | Extra Discussion | 6 | 19-02-2007 01:14 |
| pic: 1726 2007 OI | TheOtherGuy | Extra Discussion | 2 | 11-02-2007 23:17 |