|
#106
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Web Competitors 2008
|
|
#107
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Web Competitors 2008
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Microsoft obviously fail'd at making a super compatible browser. Something that works in EVERY other browser could suck in Internet Explorer, sad part is most people use it. |
|
#108
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Web Competitors 2008
Quote:
Your code would look like this: Code:
<a href="images/gallery/8/DSC00571.JPG" target="_new"><img src="images/gallery/8/DSC00571-thumbnail.JPG" width="150"> Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#109
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Web Competitors 2008
I believe that IE 5.5+ has a *.png transparency issue (something with the way that it resolves alpha), but I'm not positive that's your error.
![]() |
|
#110
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Web Competitors 2008
Yeah, the PNG is not transparent at all. Does IE maybe use color profiles or something like that?
|
|
#111
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Web Competitors 2008
Quote:
|
|
#112
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Web Competitors 2008
Quote:
|
|
#113
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Web Competitors 2008
It's difficult to explain, but yes, IE does interpret colors differently than other browsers. In your case, I'm not quite sure why that is showing up lighter/darker. Are you sure you don't have a slight transparency effect on either of the images?
|
|
#114
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Web Competitors 2008
I'd try to create the image with transparency (No background pattern overlaying the second) to see if it makes a difference, the image itself in IE looks different when loaded separately.
|
|
#115
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Web Competitors 2008
You may find your answers about .PNG file issues and Internet Explorer here: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/pngopacity/
Also, a nice program/website I found lets you install IE3, IE4.01, IE5, IE5.5, and IE6 all at once. It can help anyone out who would have browser conflicts in their code like I had... http://tredosoft.com/Multiple_IE zim2411, have you tried to take a screenshot of how your site should look (Firefox maybe?) and then crop out a new image with the background intact? Last edited by JMB226 : 29-01-2008 at 10:02. |
|
#118
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Web Competitors 2008
Well, its not a bad site with the exception of it being under construction, but bravenet free web-hosting and any ads are a major negative in FIRST's eyes.
![]() |
|
#119
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Web Competitors 2008
Quote:
By the way, did anyone else think that this year's website rubric is much easier than last season's? I mean, there's no mention of browser compatability, accessibility, or interactivity anywhere! Not that I'm complaining, but more difficult criteria makes for more interesting competition, doesn't it? Last edited by wolfj : 29-01-2008 at 15:43. Reason: I had more to say. Do you have a problem with that? It won't happen again, I promise. |
|
#120
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Web Competitors 2008
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Web Competitors 2007 | artdutra04 | Website Design/Showcase | 77 | 08-02-2008 22:46 |
| Web Competitors 2006 | artdutra04 | Website Design/Showcase | 112 | 20-11-2006 23:55 |
| Web Competitors 2005 | jonathan lall | Website Design/Showcase | 71 | 15-12-2005 01:22 |
| Web Competitors 2004 | Brandon Martus | Website Design/Showcase | 84 | 17-12-2004 18:45 |
| Web Competitors 2003 | Volte | Website Design/Showcase | 48 | 23-02-2004 12:37 |