Go to Post Just remember to be as transparent and inclusive as you can. - DonRotolo [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Pneumatics
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-01-2008, 00:48
Tristan Lall's Avatar
Tristan Lall Tristan Lall is offline
Registered User
FRC #0188 (Woburn Robotics)
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 2,484
Tristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Pneumatics Part # restrictions

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karthik View Post
The wording of <R89> had me confused for a while. This answer clears things up for me.

http://forums.usfirst.org/showthread.php?t=8447
I'm a little surprised by that response, because without some creative interpretation (which we might call "lawyering"*), it's hard to reconcile with the rule, which states:
All cylinders, regardless of source, must be identical to those listed on the Free Pneumatic Components Order Form (e.g. same part numbers).
Parker cylinders do not have the same part numbers as Bimba cylinders, so what are we to conclude? Hypothetically, I suppose the "e.g." clause could be a non-binding clarifying example like the one previously provided for the 80-inch rule (as opposed to "i.e.", which would be an unambiguous pronouncement), and "identical" could be short for "functionally identical". Even if that might be the case, I'd have to say the most obvious interpretation of the rule is that every cylinder's part number must match one provided on the form—why else would you give the example of matching numbers? Either way, that's worth clarifying once and for all in an update (if a rule is to be changed), or an unambiguous Q&A response.

Also (if we accept the permissive interpretation given above), why does the response state that these Parker cylinders must be from an old kit? If functionally identical (as opposed to matching-numbers identical) Parker cylinders are permitted under the 2nd sentence of <R89>, then according to the 3rd sentence, if they come from Parker, it's not necessary that they be from an old kit. (It must be either from Parker, from Bimba, or from an old kit; no combination of those things is required.)

*Not this again!
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-02-2008, 15:20
nvanderlugt nvanderlugt is offline
Registered User
None #2239
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 1
nvanderlugt is an unknown quantity at this point
Cool Re: Pneumatics Part # restrictions

What about 3 position Bimba cylinders, custom ordered?
There is no mention of not using 3 position cylinders.
R89 states: Any additional air cyl must source from Bimba or Parker, or recovered from prior year First Kit of Parts. Any!!
Ours are 2" Bore 12" stroke, 9" then 3" more for three positions....

Anyone?

Thanks,

Nick v.
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-02-2008, 17:30
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,810
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Pneumatics Part # restrictions

Quote:
Originally Posted by nvanderlugt View Post
What about 3 position Bimba cylinders, custom ordered?
There is no mention of not using 3 position cylinders.
R89 states: Any additional air cyl must source from Bimba or Parker, or recovered from prior year First Kit of Parts. Any!!
Ours are 2" Bore 12" stroke, 9" then 3" more for three positions....

Anyone?

Thanks,

Nick v.
Is it on the order sheet? If it isn't, don't even think of it. Or else petition FIRST to make them legal next year.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-02-2008, 18:09
jgannon's Avatar
jgannon jgannon is offline
I ᐸ3 Robots
AKA: Joey Gannon
no team
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,467
jgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Pneumatics Part # restrictions

Quote:
Originally Posted by nvanderlugt View Post
What about 3 position Bimba cylinders, custom ordered?
Eric is right. Take a look at the sentence immediately before the one you quoted.
Quote:
Originally Posted by R89
All cylinders, regardless of source, must be identical to those listed on the Free Pneumatic Components Order Form (e.g. same part numbers)
This is completely unambiguous, and has been reinforced by countless Q&A responses.
__________________
Team 1743 - The Short Circuits
2010 Pittsburgh Excellence in Design & Team Spirit Awards
2009 Pittsburgh Regional Champions (thanks to 222 and 1218)
2007 Pittsburgh Website Award
2006 Pittsburgh Regional Champions (thanks to 395 and 1038)
2006 Pittsburgh Rookie Inspiration & Highest Rookie Seed

Team 1388 - Eagle Robotics
2005 Sacramento Engineering Inspiration
2004 Curie Division Champions (thanks to 1038 and 175)
2004 Sacramento Rookie All-Star

_
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rules and restrictions seawolf814 Technical Discussion 3 16-01-2008 16:52
Wheel restrictions seawolf814 Technical Discussion 1 14-01-2008 18:40
Monty Madness Weight Restrictions Tobaby817 Off-Season Events 1 10-05-2006 16:48
Site Restrictions Darek905 Website Design/Showcase 7 20-04-2003 16:56
3 letter word restrictions??? Yucky!!! Elgin Clock CD Forum Support 4 15-12-2002 16:19


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:56.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi