|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Legalality of pnumatic ball launcher systems
Update #6 says that the rules say that a solenoid must be connected to a cylinder with 1/8" tubing. I can find no reference to this in the rules.
We were planning to connect the valve directly to the cylinder, using "off the shelf" 125 psi fittings, as permitted in rule R88. Is anyone aware of any rule in section 8.3.9 that would preclude this? Also, we are planning to store air in the Clippard tanks downstream of the regulator, at 60 PSI, instead of 120. Is anyone aware of any rule that would preclude this? |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Legalality of pnumatic ball launcher systems
Nope. You will get less air in the system, but that is your choice.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Legalality of pnumatic ball launcher systems
Question, why would you want to do this? I can't think of any advantage to it.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Legalality of pnumatic ball launcher systems
It would seem that a tank that simply stores air would allow for faster response times if it's closer to the target consumer than all other consumers, espeically during times of large air consumption. Not sure of how much performance gain there is overall, but if the target consumer is short stroke and/or timing critical I can imagine it's a big enough difference.
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Legalality of pnumatic ball launcher systems
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Legality of pnumatic ball launcher systems
Thanks for your replies regarding the legality of using the Clippard tanks for low pressure storage.
How about the first question?: Update #6 says that the rules say that a solenoid must be connected to a cylinder with 1/8" tubing. I can find no reference to this in the rules. We were planning to connect the valve directly to the cylinder, using "off the shelf" 125 psi fittings, as permitted in rule R88. Is this legal? |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Legality of pnumatic ball launcher systems
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Legality of pnumatic ball launcher systems
I'd think the main disadvantage in using a vacuum in a cylinder for energy storage is that you only get -15 psi (negative one atmosphere) pulling pressure at best, or a quarter of the pushing pressure available with a +60 psi line. You just can't pump it down any more than that.
Steve |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ball Launcher | Joe_Widen | Kit & Additional Hardware | 15 | 06-03-2006 02:59 |
| Ball Feeding Tube Legality | phrontist | Rules/Strategy | 4 | 13-02-2006 22:30 |
| 612's ball launcher - prototype | jskene | Robot Showcase | 8 | 05-02-2006 11:22 |
| 1266's Ball Launcher prototype! | NiGhtMarE_AnGeL | Robot Showcase | 16 | 30-01-2006 19:55 |
| Legality of Blocking Ball Chutes | Aignam | Rules/Strategy | 29 | 12-01-2004 14:32 |