Go to Post I heard a Lou Holtz quote as an answer to the question of "how do you motivate the unmotivated". He said " You eliminate those who are not motivated." - Scott Ritchie [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Motors
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-02-2008, 02:18
BenB's Avatar
BenB BenB is offline
Registered User
AKA: Ben Bennett
FRC #1114 (Simbotics)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Oakville, ON
Posts: 102
BenB has a reputation beyond reputeBenB has a reputation beyond reputeBenB has a reputation beyond reputeBenB has a reputation beyond reputeBenB has a reputation beyond reputeBenB has a reputation beyond reputeBenB has a reputation beyond reputeBenB has a reputation beyond reputeBenB has a reputation beyond reputeBenB has a reputation beyond reputeBenB has a reputation beyond repute
efficiency- motor vs. pnuematic

Hey,

I was wondering which would be more efficient, a motor or a pnuematic piston assuming each needs to do the same amount of work, say, lifting a single jointed arm. Is there more energy lost in the motor or the compressor to supply enough air to move the piston. I realize the draw backs of pnuematics, slow and limited (2) positions.

On the side, I understand we are not allowed to make "lightning holes" in the flag holder but how much are we allowed to modify it for mounting purposes. Also, does anyone have a better picture of the lap indicator? The one in the manual is only from above and Im not 100% sure about how it mounts.

Thanks
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-02-2008, 08:17
Betty_Krocker Betty_Krocker is offline
Fabricator/Hacker/Comic Relief
AKA: Michael
FRC #2028 (Phantom Robotics)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Hampton, VA
Posts: 105
Betty_Krocker is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to Betty_Krocker Send a message via Yahoo to Betty_Krocker
Re: efficiency- motor vs. pnuematic

Pneumatics doesnt have to be slow...
It all depends on the weight of things and how far you have to get them.
The good thing about pneumatics, is once you supply air, AN object is going to move. The reason I say AN object is going to move, is depending if it was all rigged up correctly, it should work. The downfall to pneumatics is when using cylinders to raise heavy or large objects, they require enormous amounts of air. Motors on the other hand are reliable, and you know are going to work when you supply power. Downfall to motors is that you can burn one out. As everybody knows, you dont want to release the magic smoke... (you can't burn out a cylinder!!!)

To make this short, it all depends and the wieghts and mounting places of both...
Also what system would the team use if you guys did in fact use a motor to raise the arm?
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-02-2008, 08:24
m3ch4num470r's Avatar
m3ch4num470r m3ch4num470r is offline
Registered User
FRC #0449 (Blair Robot Project)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 25
m3ch4num470r will become famous soon enough
Re: efficiency- motor vs. pnuematic

In terms of efficiency for a single movement, motors are more efficient than pneumatics. This is because your compressor is driven by a motor which gives it all the inefficiencies of a motor drive. Add this to the fact that as air pressure increases, it becomes harder and harder to compress and you get a system that uses significantly more power (and weight) than a simple motor drive.

However, I am unaware of a team that has killed its battery in 2 minutes of competition. You should probably be looking at the other features of each. Motors have more than two positions, but that isn't necessarily a disadvantage. With a cylinder, you will be reliably able to hit the two posistions, while a motor may need additional controlling systems (like a potentiometer or wheel encoder). Also, pneumatics give you holding power while a motor may slide under load. After a cylinder is energized, you don't have to add any extra power to keep it in its position, while a motor may need constant pulsing to keep it even close to where you want it. Finally, you have to consider weight since adding a compressor and 4 air tanks is a lot of extra load. My team was considering not using pneumatics just because of the weight, but our designs made pneumatics a whole heck of a lot more convenient.

Bottom line is there's a lot more to consider than pure energy efficiency.
__________________
"Then you turn the carpet on." ~Lukas

"Do you want your soul back?" ~A senior hired to prank me
"No." ~Me

  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-02-2008, 08:27
Unsung FIRST Hero
Al Skierkiewicz Al Skierkiewicz is offline
Broadcast Eng/Chief Robot Inspector
AKA: Big Al WFFA 2005
FRC #0111 (WildStang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Wheeling, IL
Posts: 10,792
Al Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: efficiency- motor vs. pnuematic

Ben,
The lap indicator is attached to a rubber stopper that is mounted to the flag. You will be given the flag with the indicator attached and you will then insert same into your flag holder and connect to your provided PWM cable.

As for the holder see this...
<R17> ROBOTS must use one of the two FLAGS provided at the event
queuing location to display their ALLIANCE color (red or blue). The
FLAG shall be held in a flag holder mounted on the ROBOT. The
only acceptable flag holder is a 12 inch long piece of 1/2” (nominal)
Schedule 40 PVC tube. The tube must be a single, contiguous
piece, capped with a commercial PVC pipe cap cemented at the
bottom end. The tube must not have any “lightening holes” or other
modifications other than mounting holes, paint, or other decorative
surface finishes.

I read that as "mounting holes" are acceptable. R18 specifies that a 2" radius around the top of the flag holder must be maintained for the lap indicator.

As to the pneumatics vs. motor, this is a long standing debate and there is no good answer. All things being equal, if this was the only thing you needed air for, I would tend to go with a motor. If you need air for other parts of your design, then it would require some additional thought on your part as to what your actual requirements might be.
__________________
Good Luck All. Learn something new, everyday!
Al
WB9UVJ
www.wildstang.org
________________________
Storming the Tower since 1996.
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-02-2008, 09:37
MrForbes's Avatar
MrForbes MrForbes is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jim
FRC #1726 (N.E.R.D.S.)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Sierra Vista AZ
Posts: 6,011
MrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: efficiency- motor vs. pnuematic

There are advantages and disadvantages to each. Motors allow precise position control. Pneumatics allow you to put the heavy motor and storage tanks down low on the robot, and use a lightweight cylinder where it is needed, which might help the weight balance. Usually it is much simpler to connect a cylinder (two bolts!) than to rig up a gear/sprocket reduction system for a motor, and you can store energy in the tanks for relatively quick release.

So, as usual, the right choice depends on way too many variables, and you need to evaluate each situation individually.

Notice that none of the considerations I mentioned have anything to do with efficiency! because that is usually not a very important factor in this type of robot design.

Last edited by MrForbes : 01-02-2008 at 09:58.
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-02-2008, 09:46
GaryVoshol's Avatar
GaryVoshol GaryVoshol is offline
Cogito ergo arbitro
no team
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 5,747
GaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond repute
Re: efficiency- motor vs. pnuematic

Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Skierkiewicz View Post
Ben,
The lap indicator is attached to a rubber stopper that is mounted to the flag. You will be given the flag with the indicator attached and you will then insert same into your flag holder and connect to your provided PWM cable.

As for the holder see this...
<R17> ROBOTS must use one of the two FLAGS provided at the event
queuing location to display their ALLIANCE color (red or blue). The
FLAG shall be held in a flag holder mounted on the ROBOT. The
only acceptable flag holder is a 12 inch long piece of 1/2” (nominal)
Schedule 40 PVC tube. The tube must be a single, contiguous
piece, capped with a commercial PVC pipe cap cemented at the
bottom end. The tube must not have any “lightening holes” or other
modifications other than mounting holes, paint, or other decorative
surface finishes.

I read that as "mounting holes" are acceptable. R18 specifies that a 2" radius around the top of the flag holder must be maintained for the lap indicator.
Please note that 1/2" nominal Schedule 40 PVC does not have a 1/2" dimension anywhere. http://forums.usfirst.org/showthread...hlight=nominal
Quote:
Originally Posted by Q&A
Please refer Rule <R17> as amended in Team Update #4. The flag holder must be made of 1/2 inch (nominal) Schedule 40 PVC tube. This material has an outside diameter of 0.840 inches and an inside diameter of 0.622 inches
__________________
(since 2004)
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fuel efficiency or home efficiency contest John Gutmann Technical Discussion 12 07-08-2007 21:59
Plantery Gearbox Efficiency Leo Motors 5 05-08-2007 14:40
code efficiency Anton Programming 4 13-02-2005 15:24
gearbox efficiency hi_im_sean Motors 1 26-01-2003 21:29
Motor efficiency archiver 2001 1 23-06-2002 23:30


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 15:03.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi