|
|
|
 I believe that those who have a clear understanding of their capabilities, both physical and financial, and design and build within those capabilities are the teams that succeed. - Daniel_LaFleur [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#25
02-02-2008, 17:56
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Q&A response - new interpretation of R16
if the rule says a CYLINDER, then why is there talk of squares and triangles
we cant do anything by complaining. its just one of the thing that we have to design around. its part of engineering. but....... the way my team figured it out was that if the up right arm is 5 ft, and another arm(52 in) to extend out and reach up w/ claws ( at least 20 in it grab ball) to clear the front of the bot and bumpers, it will extend past the 80 in. theres almost no way that any bot would be able to pick the ball up and put it on the rack. this was just my team, and we put it 2gether this morning, and found out it was 31 in too long when we had to grab the ball. -team 270 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Penalty re: <R16> | GaryVoshol | Rules/Strategy | 4 | 10-01-2008 15:56 |
| R16 Playing Configuration | skimoose | Rules/Strategy | 11 | 07-01-2008 09:18 |
| Senator Response re:FIRST & the state budget | Brandon Martus | Announcements | 2 | 03-11-2007 16:45 |
| New Bumper rule interpretation - straight from the lead inspector | Gary Dillard | Rules/Strategy | 17 | 12-03-2007 14:56 |
| Update 6 Q&A # 132 ... INTERPRETATION PLEASE!!!! | archiver | 2001 | 2 | 24-06-2002 00:26 |
Threaded Mode