Go to Post hmmm... big open space between arena and pits... thousands of poof balls...thousands of high school kids hopped up on sugar and robotics.... sounds a little dangerous. - Courtneyb1023 [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy > You Make The Call
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-02-2008, 10:31
ALIBI's Avatar
ALIBI ALIBI is offline
Registered User
FRC #0141
Team Role: Parent
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 271
ALIBI is a name known to allALIBI is a name known to allALIBI is a name known to allALIBI is a name known to allALIBI is a name known to allALIBI is a name known to all
Re: [YMTC]: Hurtling Interference YMTC

Assuming that Blueabot was in possession of a trackball when it entered its' home stretch and that Blueabot has the ability to Hurdle, the following conditions have been met:

1: In it's home stretch,
2: Be in possession of a trackball,
3: Be moving towards the overpass.

By the definition of HURDLING, Blueabot was in the process of HURDLING.

The intent of <G42> is to protect Blueabot while Hurdling. The protection is for overt, blatant or aggressive contact that interferes with the Hurdling attempt. When Redabot pushes Blueabot completely through its' home stretch, it is being overt, blatant and aggressive, the action of Redabot results in a ten point penalty. Redabot could have incidental contact while passing Blueabot, however, pushing Blueabot through its' home stretch is not incidental contact.

It seems as though when a robot that can Hurdle is in possession of a trackball in its' home stretch, it is pretty much off limits unless you are making incidental contact or bumping to pass per <G38>. However:

There are two questions that come to mind. The first is the requirement that Blueabot be "moving toward the overpass". If Blueabot stops moving just before it launches the trackball, can Redabot then push Blueabot because it is no longer moving toward the overpass? The second is the requirement that Blueabot be elevating the trackball so that the top of the trackball is higher than the Lane Divider. This seems to indicate that Blueabot must keep moving while it is elevating the trackball to at least a height where the top of the trackball is above the Lane Divider to be given protection under <G42>. If Blueabot stops moving before the trackball is elevated so that the top of the trackball is above the Lane Divider, can Redabot then push Blueabot?

The YMTC never gave Blueabot the opportunity to stop moving so the above questions never come into play. Ten Point Penalty on Redabot.

Last edited by ALIBI : 13-02-2008 at 10:41.
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-02-2008, 10:48
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,787
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [YMTC]: Hurtling Interference YMTC

Blueabot satisfies 2 of the three conditions for sure: it is in its own Home Stretch, and it is in possession of a Trackball.

The thing is, this will be context dependent. As in, if Blueabot stopped to hurdle before Redabot hit it, or if Blueabot's launching mechanism is beginning to fire. Those can change the situation. In the former, Blueabot is not protected; in the latter, Blueabot would probably be protected, as it is in the process of elevating the Trackball.

Neither we nor the GDC can call this one; that'll be the ref's decision in each individual match. In this case as stated, there would be a penalty on Redabot, because Blueabot is moving towards the Overpass (admittedly, not exactly willingly, which might change the call).
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-02-2008, 13:26
JesseK's Avatar
JesseK JesseK is offline
Expert Flybot Crasher
FRC #1885 (ILITE)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 3,661
JesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [YMTC]: Hurtling Interference YMTC

If Bluabot can only HERD the ball and never has the intention to ever HURDLE the ball due to lack of design or broken ability, there is no rule that would give me a reason to call this a penalty. However, this is subjective to how the refs will call it.
__________________

Drive Coach, 1885 (2007-present)
CAD Library Updated 5/1/16 - 2016 Curie/Carver Industrial Design Winner
GitHub
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-02-2008, 14:02
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,787
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [YMTC]: Hurtling Interference YMTC

Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseK View Post
If Bluabot can only HERD the ball and never has the intention to ever HURDLE the ball due to lack of design or broken ability, there is no rule that would give me a reason to call this a penalty. However, this is subjective to how the refs will call it.
Sometimes refs can't judge intention very well. Blatant intention will almost always be called, however. If Blueabot can only herd at that time, no penalty (not in possession). If they can launch, and they act like they are going to, I'd probably call a penalty on Redabot, but if they aren't even trying, no penalty

Oh, and the decision I made earlier--Reversed; nothing was said about a trackball. Period. They could all be in the other corner. No penalty.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-02-2008, 15:08
Rick's Avatar
Rick Rick is offline
Ready to STRIKE!
AKA: Rick Blight
FRC #0078 (AIR STRIKE)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Tiverton, RI, USA
Posts: 634
Rick has a reputation beyond reputeRick has a reputation beyond reputeRick has a reputation beyond reputeRick has a reputation beyond reputeRick has a reputation beyond reputeRick has a reputation beyond reputeRick has a reputation beyond reputeRick has a reputation beyond reputeRick has a reputation beyond reputeRick has a reputation beyond reputeRick has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [YMTC]: Hurtling Interference YMTC

Depends on this is read:

Quote:
(be moving toward the OVERPASS) and/or (elevating the TRACKBALL so that the top of the TRACKBALL is higher than the LANE DIVIDER).
or it could be this way

Quote:
(be moving toward the OVERPASS so that the top of the TRACKBALL is higher than the LANE DIVIDER) and/or (elevating the TRACKBALL so that the top of the TRACKBALL is higher than the LANE DIVIDER).
This could be read as the TRACKBALL must be above the lane divider for any valid hurdle attempt. Or only motion is required.
__________________
Like Aquidneck Island Robotics on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[YMTC]: YMTC: Thank You Game Design Committee Natchez You Make The Call 2 16-01-2007 23:30
YMTC - Manufacturing Steve W General Forum 46 05-09-2006 02:35
YMTC: worthy of DQ? Levin571 You Make The Call 7 15-03-2005 16:09
YMTC: Should YMTC have a future Natchez You Make The Call 13 21-04-2004 00:46
YMTC: Is it goaltending? Natchez You Make The Call 43 12-04-2004 18:03


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:58.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi