|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [YMTC]: Hurtling Interference YMTC
Assuming that Blueabot was in possession of a trackball when it entered its' home stretch and that Blueabot has the ability to Hurdle, the following conditions have been met:
1: In it's home stretch, 2: Be in possession of a trackball, 3: Be moving towards the overpass. By the definition of HURDLING, Blueabot was in the process of HURDLING. The intent of <G42> is to protect Blueabot while Hurdling. The protection is for overt, blatant or aggressive contact that interferes with the Hurdling attempt. When Redabot pushes Blueabot completely through its' home stretch, it is being overt, blatant and aggressive, the action of Redabot results in a ten point penalty. Redabot could have incidental contact while passing Blueabot, however, pushing Blueabot through its' home stretch is not incidental contact. It seems as though when a robot that can Hurdle is in possession of a trackball in its' home stretch, it is pretty much off limits unless you are making incidental contact or bumping to pass per <G38>. However: There are two questions that come to mind. The first is the requirement that Blueabot be "moving toward the overpass". If Blueabot stops moving just before it launches the trackball, can Redabot then push Blueabot because it is no longer moving toward the overpass? The second is the requirement that Blueabot be elevating the trackball so that the top of the trackball is higher than the Lane Divider. This seems to indicate that Blueabot must keep moving while it is elevating the trackball to at least a height where the top of the trackball is above the Lane Divider to be given protection under <G42>. If Blueabot stops moving before the trackball is elevated so that the top of the trackball is above the Lane Divider, can Redabot then push Blueabot? The YMTC never gave Blueabot the opportunity to stop moving so the above questions never come into play. Ten Point Penalty on Redabot. Last edited by ALIBI : 13-02-2008 at 10:41. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: [YMTC]: Hurtling Interference YMTC
Blueabot satisfies 2 of the three conditions for sure: it is in its own Home Stretch, and it is in possession of a Trackball.
The thing is, this will be context dependent. As in, if Blueabot stopped to hurdle before Redabot hit it, or if Blueabot's launching mechanism is beginning to fire. Those can change the situation. In the former, Blueabot is not protected; in the latter, Blueabot would probably be protected, as it is in the process of elevating the Trackball. Neither we nor the GDC can call this one; that'll be the ref's decision in each individual match. In this case as stated, there would be a penalty on Redabot, because Blueabot is moving towards the Overpass (admittedly, not exactly willingly, which might change the call). |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [YMTC]: Hurtling Interference YMTC
If Bluabot can only HERD the ball and never has the intention to ever HURDLE the ball due to lack of design or broken ability, there is no rule that would give me a reason to call this a penalty. However, this is subjective to how the refs will call it.
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: [YMTC]: Hurtling Interference YMTC
Quote:
Oh, and the decision I made earlier--Reversed; nothing was said about a trackball. Period. They could all be in the other corner. No penalty. |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: [YMTC]: Hurtling Interference YMTC
Depends on this is read:
Quote:
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [YMTC]: YMTC: Thank You Game Design Committee | Natchez | You Make The Call | 2 | 16-01-2007 23:30 |
| YMTC - Manufacturing | Steve W | General Forum | 46 | 05-09-2006 02:35 |
| YMTC: worthy of DQ? | Levin571 | You Make The Call | 7 | 15-03-2005 16:09 |
| YMTC: Should YMTC have a future | Natchez | You Make The Call | 13 | 21-04-2004 00:46 |
| YMTC: Is it goaltending? | Natchez | You Make The Call | 43 | 12-04-2004 18:03 |