|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Define "ROBOT"
You don't need a new definition, the ones present are adequate. Their two configurations/two robots didn't pass inspection as such, and as such do not count as a robot.
I'm not going to comment on whether or not the decision not to pass them is right or wrong, that's the subject of the other thread. However, since they collectively did NOT pass inspection, they collectively do not count as a robot, by the definition presented. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Championship Event - Where the "Random" Match Sorting Really "Shines" | Travis Hoffman | Championship Event | 57 | 19-04-2007 08:06 |
| New NEMO White Papers! "Creating a Killer Packet" and "25 Ways to Sponsor" | Jessica Boucher | Team Organization | 0 | 10-08-2005 10:55 |
| "Thunderbirds" Vs. "Team America" Which one will rule the box office? | Elgin Clock | Chit-Chat | 3 | 07-09-2004 19:53 |
| Conflict between "Initialize_Tracker()" and "pwm13 & pwm15"? Kevin? | gnormhurst | Programming | 3 | 22-02-2004 02:55 |
| Calling all Lawyers... ...Define "all parts" | Joe Johnson | General Forum | 10 | 13-03-2002 15:12 |