|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2008 Ultimate Alliance
From what I saw last week, mine is
1114, 121, and 25. But, this will all change in the coming weeks. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2008 Ultimate Alliance
Quote:
but when you see a well respected person from an elite team mention your robot as part of the "ultimate" alliance the recognition is a great feeling. so prove yourself worthy ![]() |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2008 Ultimate Alliance
hey i have on question what type of alliance is the utlimate
three hurdlers all fast or two hurdlers one lapbot |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2008 Ultimate Alliance
Quote:
of course, having 3 swerves didn't hurt Last edited by hillale : 07-03-2008 at 14:11. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2008 Ultimate Alliance
Quote:
however the only disadvantage i can find(its not too big either) to having another hurdler is that you would have another tall obstruction of your view while trying to hurdle; meanwhile if you had a small low lapbot you could easily just bob and weave through jams and no matter what happens you can easily rack up points and to the hurdlers there will only be 4 other bots in their way instead of 5 |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2008 Ultimate Alliance
1126, 1629, and 148
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2008 Ultimate Alliance
the only problem i see with that alliance is that only 1126 can get the ball down.
I'm surprised that 1731 hasn't been mentioned, but i'm not sure who i would say is the ultimate alliance yet. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2008 Ultimate Alliance
330,987,968
|
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2008 Ultimate Alliance
They are all great teams, but you really only need 2 hurdlers in an alliance.
I think 330, 968, and a lap bot vs. 1114, 217, and a lap bot would be intense. 987 and 1717 should also be considered. Last edited by NoahTheBoa : 23-03-2008 at 20:36. |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2008 Ultimate Alliance
1114,1024,217. I know I chose three hurdlers but, should someone break there are still 2 hurdles left. Also 1114's auto is the best I've seen yet, and If i remember right 1024 and 217 have kick butt auto's as well so they might set an Auto record. Also this alliance may be capable of breaking the 200 point barrier.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2008 Ultimate Alliance
that would be scary.....and awesome. depending on which side you are on...
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2008 Ultimate Alliance
As it stands right now, my ultimate alliance is 1114, 330, and 148. If 1726 can upgrade their hybrid to be more competitive with 148's, I would go with 1114, 330, and 1726 due to 1726's considerable prowess at knocking off balls (especially compared to 148's lack of any knock-off mechanism). If 1625 can chase out the mechanical gremlins, I would go with 1114, 1625, and 1726/148.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2008 Ultimate Alliance
Hmm maybe I shouldn't post my own team but whatever.
My ultimate alliance: 1114 , 1126 and 2228. Hmmm I wonder why the first 2 teams sound sooo familiar ![]() |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2008 Ultimate Alliance
You may get a glimpse of it in Hawaii this weekend, week 5, as many of the "top tier" teams will be competing.
Just to name a few. 254, 968, 25, 233, 337, 368 (all of whom are 2008 gold winners after week 3). If teams like 330, 103, 987 and others ever decided to come in '09 with the same group as '08, that would be scary. Other regional finalists/winners from '07 and '08: 1138, 597, 2024, and 359 attending. There are no slouches for all of the veteran teams participating. ![]() |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2008 Ultimate Alliance
Quote:
How many regionals do the Hawaiian kids go to? ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Best Alliance in the Alliance Era of FIRST | Corey Balint | General Forum | 28 | 05-09-2006 20:14 |
| The Ultimate Showdown of Ultimate FIRSTiny | Billfred | Chit-Chat | 4 | 12-04-2006 22:43 |
| ULTIMATE CHALLENGE | negfrequency | Inventor | 14 | 12-04-2006 19:54 |
| Ultimate @ Nationals | archiver | 2000 | 4 | 23-06-2002 22:29 |
| Ultimate anyone? | archiver | 2000 | 2 | 23-06-2002 22:20 |