|
|
|
 every year presents new challenges. What worked well last year might well be a clunker-bot this year. keep an open mind! - KenWittlief [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| every year presents new challenges. What worked well last year might well be a clunker-bot this year. keep an open mind! - KenWittlief [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#6
09-03-2008, 20:39
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Important 80 inches!!!
Being capable of exceeding 80" is not a violation of any rules. Inspectors have only been asked to identify robots that are capable of breaking that rule during competition. It's up to the referees to ultimately enforce the 80" rule. Inspectors are simply flagging the potentional violators for the refs.
A good example of this - a robot has a pair of arms (one fore and one aft) that exceeds 80" when simultaneously extended. As long as they only extend 1 at a time during the competition, they won't violate the rule. Russ Beavis Chief Inspector |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Way over 80 inches!!! | iPilipino | General Forum | 10 | 17-02-2008 12:36 |
| 80 inches | Pneumaticsman | Rules/Strategy | 6 | 20-01-2008 00:01 |
| 4 inches vs. 1 foot | Golfer241 | Technical Discussion | 24 | 15-02-2007 00:42 |
| pic: 2004 Robot+ 2 Ringers= 12 inches | 358_4_Life | Extra Discussion | 5 | 16-01-2007 08:11 |
| pic: 612 rollin on 6 inches | Priyadarshy | Extra Discussion | 6 | 12-10-2006 15:46 |
Threaded Mode