Go to Post I'm missing JVN's build log this year ! - lynca [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-03-2008, 19:29
John Hooper John Hooper is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Here
Posts: 14
John Hooper can only hope to improve
Rookie Team impressions from Kettering

We are back from the rookie competition at Kettering University in Flint, Michigan, and I was asked to pass along my impressions of the competition.

As co-leader of the MiGHT Robotics team, I found the event to be wonderful. There were some nasty technical difficulties in the beginning, but the arena electronics problems were completely unprecedented in the history of FIRST, so live and learn.

I thought the event, the announcer, the referees, and the teams that came just to help out were really great and created a very positive impression for rookie teams.

If I were going to complain, it wouldn’t be about the event, it would be that certain aspects of the game were completely wrong for the teams and spectators. Games should not be decided by the referees after the game is over. I can’t think of any sport that consistently forces referees to decide the outcome of matches. Spectators want to be in the moment, and waiting to find out who “really” won after the match, based on penalties, is a big negative. Also, the penalties seemed overly harsh and capricious. In real sporting events, teams are penalized for doing things that give them an advantage. Accidentally “breaking the plane” of a line you have crossed conferred no advantage, and was penalized very harshly in a game where it is difficult to score. It would be like if the NFL had a one touchdown penalty for an offensive linemen stepping back with his right foot first instead of his left.

Imagine how the team (and particularly the individual driver) felt who lost his or her team and alliance the final match by “breaking the plane”. Why in the world is that a TEN POINT penalty!

So, I thought the event was great, but I think the rules of the game should be more balanced and reasonable, and referees should only very rarely be reversing the outcome of games. For the record, our team had very few penalties, so this isn’t just grumbling.

We had a great time and learned a tremendous amount, so thank you to all those who worked so hard to put on an invaluable event just for us rookies!

John Hooper
MiGHT Robotics
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-03-2008, 19:39
dlavery's Avatar
dlavery dlavery is offline
Curmudgeon
FRC #0116 (Epsilon Delta)
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 3,176
dlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Rookie Team impressions from Kettering

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Hooper View Post
There were some nasty technical difficulties in the beginning, but the arena electronics problems were completely unprecedented in the history of FIRST, so live and learn.
Apparently, you were not in Portland a few years ago.

-dave
__________________
"I know what you're thinking, punk," hissed Wordy Harry to his new editor, "you're thinking, 'Did he use six superfluous adjectives or only five?' - and to tell the truth, I forgot myself in all this excitement; but being as this is English, the most powerful language in the world, whose subtle nuances will blow your head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel loquacious?' - well do you, punk?"
- Stuart Vasepuru, 2006 Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest



My OTHER CAR is still on Mars!!!
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-03-2008, 19:45
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,823
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Rookie Team impressions from Kettering

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Hooper View Post
Imagine how the team (and particularly the individual driver) felt who lost his or her team and alliance the final match by “breaking the plane”. Why in the world is that a TEN POINT penalty!

So, I thought the event was great, but I think the rules of the game should be more balanced and reasonable, and referees should only very rarely be reversing the outcome of games. For the record, our team had very few penalties, so this isn’t just grumbling.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlavery View Post
Apparently, you were not in Portland a few years ago.

-dave
I also don't think he was around in 2005, when the slightest contact with a robot on the other alliance while they were in a certain area was 30 points. That one swung more than one match.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-03-2008, 22:06
XXShadowXX's Avatar
XXShadowXX XXShadowXX is offline
They call me Cody.
no team (None currently :\)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Pontiac; MI
Posts: 408
XXShadowXX has much to be proud ofXXShadowXX has much to be proud ofXXShadowXX has much to be proud ofXXShadowXX has much to be proud ofXXShadowXX has much to be proud ofXXShadowXX has much to be proud ofXXShadowXX has much to be proud ofXXShadowXX has much to be proud ofXXShadowXX has much to be proud ofXXShadowXX has much to be proud of
Re: Rookie Team impressions from Kettering

i was there, and we didn't have a problem with the breaking the plane issue. Its just part of the game, watch for the flags during the match, and you will get an idea of what the out come will be.
__________________
Is now an engineer thanks to FIRST.
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-03-2008, 22:39
scottanderson's Avatar
scottanderson scottanderson is offline
Software Architect
AKA: Scott Anderson
FRC #2608 (MiGHT)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Shelby Township
Posts: 20
scottanderson is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Rookie Team impressions from Kettering

It seems to me that something like an intentional ram or interference should be a bigger penalty than plane breaking, but oh well. It is what it is.

Hopefully we won't have to spend 2.5 hours on the field while everyone else is working on their robots at regionals, though. :-)
__________________
Regards,
Scott Anderson
Team 2608 MiGHT Mentor
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-03-2008, 23:54
John Hooper John Hooper is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Here
Posts: 14
John Hooper can only hope to improve
Re: Rookie Team impressions from Kettering

Quote:
Originally Posted by dlavery View Post
Apparently, you were not in Portland a few years ago.

-dave
Being a rookie, all I know is what I was told. This problem was with the arena electronics not being able to communicate with all of the robots. At first, some robots could not be shut down, then some of them in certain positions could not move at all.

If this is a common problem, I am surprised they don't bring backup systems. Rock stars don't stop concerts for a few hours to fiddle around with their sound systems.

Having huge penalties for easily made mistakes that give a team no advantage only serves to make the rules more important than the competition, the robots, and the spectators. If the purpose of FIRST is to promote engineering and technology like a sport, hoping to tap into the same excitement that people feel for sports, then the rules should be reasonable and not interfere with the game.

Even if your team didn't have a problem with the rule, the game is played in alliance with two other teams, and either one of them could knock out your entire score in less than ten seconds. I think the actual intent of the rule was to stop teams from going backwards to grab balls or score. It wasn't really the intent of the rule to obliterate a lot of good work just because a robot, while trying to race around a track, over-corrected coming out of a turn.

Also, you can tell spectators to watch for flags and mentally adjust the scores while they are watching, but there is a good reason why sports aren't played this way: people don't like it. People don't want to watch two race cars blast down the final stretch and see one outmuscle the other, only to have it decided five minutes later that actually both of those cars lost because of penalties that happened dozens of laps before, and really the third place car won.

Sure, make the rules any way you like: but if the purpose is to promote your cause and draw in the public, these rules don't work.
Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-03-2008, 12:44
Swan217's Avatar
Swan217 Swan217 is offline
RoboShow Producer
AKA: DJ Royal Fusion
no team (RoboShow)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Detroit Raised, Orlando Adopted
Posts: 568
Swan217 has a reputation beyond reputeSwan217 has a reputation beyond reputeSwan217 has a reputation beyond reputeSwan217 has a reputation beyond reputeSwan217 has a reputation beyond reputeSwan217 has a reputation beyond reputeSwan217 has a reputation beyond reputeSwan217 has a reputation beyond reputeSwan217 has a reputation beyond reputeSwan217 has a reputation beyond reputeSwan217 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Swan217
Re: Rookie Team impressions from Kettering

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Hooper View Post
Being a rookie, all I know is what I was told. This problem was with the arena electronics not being able to communicate with all of the robots. At first, some robots could not be shut down, then some of them in certain positions could not move at all.

If this is a common problem, I am surprised they don't bring backup systems. Rock stars don't stop concerts for a few hours to fiddle around with their sound systems.
The problem was with the transmitters. They do pack extra transmitters, but there was only one spare left for this event and two transmitters failed. The FTA (official FIRST Tech guru) was trying to fix the system instead of work around it. This is not a common occurence and is usually resolved within an hour. In this case we had to get spare transmitters shipped next-day to fix the system (delivered during lunch Saturday), so when the Qualifying matches commenced, they were on a jury-rigged system.

Seperately, the inspectors mentioned that most teams were glad for the shutdown, because though it was boring for the spectators, the pit crews used this valuable time to greatly upgrade their robots, which resulted in a more exciting competition than what would've happened otherwise. Just a point that a waste of time for some was very valuable to others.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Hooper View Post
Yata Yata Penalty criticism
The result of all of the penalties being called was more disciplined drivers. As the competition went on, the referees threw fewer and fewer penalties (The finals didn't have any penalties thrown). It's a learning curve that teams work through, and this group of very green teams performed spectacularly in handling the learning curve and other challanges the game presented.

These rookie teams ran the spectrum from decent to spectacular. The rookie hurdlers made for a very exciting elimination round. I think this is the first regional where I can honestly say that there wasn't one useless team. Every team did what it was designed to do very well and efficiently. There weren't any lame ducks on this pond. These teams performed better than many veteran teams that I see.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dlavery
Apparently, you were not in Portland a few years ago.
I wasn't there, but I saw the webcast and recall two Portlands that had massive delays (one was '04, I think the other was '06). This delay was much worse. At least Mark Leon could keep the crowd somewhat engaged during the shutdown.
__________________
Orlando Regional Planning Committee & Cohost of The RoboShow & RoboVision

Follow The RoboShow on Twitter @RoboShowLive & check out our website, www.theroboshow.net

Follow RoboVision on Twitter @RoboVisionOD & check out our website, www.robovisionod.com





"As president, I believe that robotics can inspire young people to pursue science and engineering. And I also want to keep an eye on those robots in case they try anything."
— President Barack Obama
Reply With Quote
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-03-2008, 14:15
John Hooper John Hooper is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Here
Posts: 14
John Hooper can only hope to improve
Re: Rookie Team impressions from Kettering

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Swando View Post
Seperately, the inspectors mentioned that most teams were glad for the shutdown, because though it was boring for the spectators, the pit crews used this valuable time to greatly upgrade their robots, which resulted in a more exciting competition than what would've happened otherwise. Just a point that a waste of time for some was very valuable to others.
Our robot, and five others, were kept on the track for hours, so the long delay was both boring to the spectators and a disadvantage to our team and others.

Quote:
The result of all of the penalties being called was more disciplined drivers. As the competition went on, the referees threw fewer and fewer penalties (The finals didn't have any penalties thrown). It's a learning curve that teams work through, and this group of very green teams performed spectacularly in handling the learning curve and other challanges the game presented.
As I saw it, the referees mercifully relaxed the "breaking the plane" rule quite a bit, which was clearly the right thing to do. We did instruct our drivers to never back up, even if a robot had them blocked in, unless they were absolutely certain they were nowhere near a line. This didn't improve the game, it just meant that people sat stuck at the ends of the track a lot, afraid to back up and go around.

I don't know why anyone wants to argue for a penalty that is obviously far too severe and damages the flow of the game.

I am giving feedback and making suggestions in an attempt to improve the competitions and further the stated goals of FIRST. I am a middle-aged software engineer who is donating a lot of time and money to participate in FIRST because I believe it is a good idea.

Robots can be greatly improved in a few hours, and competitions and competition rules can be improved over time as well -- but not if you spin negatives into positives and live in delusion.
Reply With Quote
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-03-2008, 14:25
Jack Jones Jack Jones is offline
Retired
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Waterford, MI
Posts: 964
Jack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Rookie Team impressions from Kettering

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Swando View Post
...
Seperately, the inspectors mentioned that most teams were glad for the shutdown, because though it was boring for the spectators, the pit crews used this valuable time to greatly upgrade their robots, which resulted in a more exciting competition than what would've happened otherwise. Just a point that a waste of time for some was very valuable to others.


The result of all of the penalties being called was more disciplined drivers. As the competition went on, the referees threw fewer and fewer penalties (The finals didn't have any penalties thrown). It's a learning curve that teams work through, and this group of very green teams performed spectacularly in handling the learning curve and other challanges the game presented.
...
What was the up-side for the six on the field and six more in the que during the 3++ hour delay? Do you think maybe the pits should have been closed until all teams had access?

I saw just about as many infractions later on as I saw early, but not as many being called. I assumed it was because the refs had gotten too tired to catch every last one.
Reply With Quote
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-03-2008, 14:40
John Hooper John Hooper is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Here
Posts: 14
John Hooper can only hope to improve
Re: Rookie Team impressions from Kettering

Oops, double post.
Reply With Quote
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-03-2008, 14:45
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,823
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Rookie Team impressions from Kettering

John, before you think poorly of the penalties this year (a little late, I know), there was a rule in 2005 that was far, far worse.

Starting at the beginning here: There were 8 triangular "loading zones" on the field, 4 per alliance. Teams "in" the zones were protected, much like a hurdler is this year. This was due to safety issues.

Problem #1: the definition of "in the zone" changed repeatedly. Eventually, it was "anything touching the zone is in" and stayed that way. I think this was somewhere around Week 1, maybe a little later.

Problem #2: any contact with a robot retrieving scoring objects in the zone was a 30-point penalty.

Oh, and scores were lower that year, comparatively.

This meant that contacting a robot in the loading zone was almost a sure guarantee of losing the match.

It's better this year, though not by much. At least the refs don't have to decide whether to give 30 points or 10 points in penalties (yes, there were two different point values in 2005! 30 points as above, and 10 points for anything else).

I'm not trying to put a positive light on this, just show that there have been worse penalties in the past.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

Reply With Quote
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-03-2008, 15:00
John Hooper John Hooper is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Here
Posts: 14
John Hooper can only hope to improve
Re: Rookie Team impressions from Kettering

If that is true, Eric, then all the more reason for FIRST to be responsive in improving the rules. Maybe I have been naive in taking the stated goals of FIRST seriously. There is no doubt that Draconian penalties for slight acccidental infractions that in no way confer an advantage to your team ruins the competition for spectators, and they certainly don't make the participants happy either ... well, except for the teams that are lucky enough to escape these penalties and lucky enough to be in alliance with teams who manage to avoid such penalties.

Maybe every team should spin a big dial after matches as well, and have huge random numbers arbitrarily added to or deducted from their scores.
Reply With Quote
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-03-2008, 15:26
Craig Roys's Avatar
Craig Roys Craig Roys is offline
Coach - Team 1718
FRC #1718 (The Fighting Pi)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Armada, MI
Posts: 244
Craig Roys has a reputation beyond reputeCraig Roys has a reputation beyond reputeCraig Roys has a reputation beyond reputeCraig Roys has a reputation beyond reputeCraig Roys has a reputation beyond reputeCraig Roys has a reputation beyond reputeCraig Roys has a reputation beyond reputeCraig Roys has a reputation beyond reputeCraig Roys has a reputation beyond reputeCraig Roys has a reputation beyond reputeCraig Roys has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Rookie Team impressions from Kettering

John,
The problem, as I see it, is this - where do you draw the line? The rule states that you must move counterclockwise around the track and once you completely enter a zone you cannot cross back. Consider the following two scenarios:

1) Robot A rounds a corner, crosses the line and accidentally crosses back briefly before moving on.

2) Robot B rounds a corner, crosses the line and turns to pick up a ball on the line causing them to briefly cross back before moving on.

Both robots did the same thing, but in one case it was a big advantage and in the other case it was a mistake. The refs shouldn't have to decide the intent of the robot recrossing the line - that would/could be too subjective causing more arguments.

Consider a high-sticking pentalty in hockey. It doesn't matter the intent of the player high-sticking, just that they can't do it. A large number of high-sticking pentalties are accidents, but you need to be in control of your stick. Robot drivers need to be in control of their robot.

I'm not saying I like or dislike the rule, but I understand why it is called the way it is.

Just my $0.02
__________________
2016 Waterford District - Semifinalists and Entrepreneurship Award Winner!
2016 Troy District - District Winner and Chairman's Award Winner!
2016 MI State Championship - State Champs with 27, 67, and 6086 and Entrepreneurship Award Winner!
2016 FIRST Championship - Carson Field Quarterfinalists


Reply With Quote
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-03-2008, 16:38
Andy Baker's Avatar Woodie Flowers Award
Andy Baker Andy Baker is offline
President, AndyMark, Inc.
FRC #3940 (CyberTooth)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Kokomo, Indiana
Posts: 3,422
Andy Baker has a reputation beyond reputeAndy Baker has a reputation beyond reputeAndy Baker has a reputation beyond reputeAndy Baker has a reputation beyond reputeAndy Baker has a reputation beyond reputeAndy Baker has a reputation beyond reputeAndy Baker has a reputation beyond reputeAndy Baker has a reputation beyond reputeAndy Baker has a reputation beyond reputeAndy Baker has a reputation beyond reputeAndy Baker has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Andy Baker
Re: Rookie Team impressions from Kettering

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Hooper View Post
Our robot, and five others, were kept on the track for hours, so the long delay was both boring to the spectators and a disadvantage to our team and others.

As I saw it, the referees mercifully relaxed the "breaking the plane" rule quite a bit, which was clearly the right thing to do.
Two points here...

1. In retrospect, we should have cleared the field earlier and had those teams come back out when the work-around was put in place. We kept trying to fix it, and kept thinking that the next action was going to make things all better. I agree that this was unfair to the teams on the field. I am sorry that we did not clear the field earlier.

2. No, the referees did not relax G22 as the competition went on. We worked hard to be consistent through the entire event. Clearly, drivers got better. As the head referee, I spoke with many drivers as Saturday's matches proceeded, telling them that they were getting considerably better. The day ended with the final 2 matches being penalty-free, if I recall correctly.

From my perspective, this rookie event was great. This event prepared all of these teams to compete at a high level at their official FIRST events during the upcoming weeks.

Andy Baker
Reply With Quote
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-03-2008, 16:42
John Hooper John Hooper is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Here
Posts: 14
John Hooper can only hope to improve
Re: Rookie Team impressions from Kettering

Craig,

I agree that sometimes "intention" rules can lead to subjective and inconsistent rulings that are also unpopular. However, they are often used in sports like soccer and football for flagrant or unsportmanlike actions, carrying a much higher penalty for the same action. I personally didn't see a robot "breaking the plane" in an attempt to get a ball. Every case appeared to be accidental. If it had been a 2 point penalty, it wouldn't have changed the outcome of many games.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kettering University Rookie Competition ComradeNikolai Regional Competitions 50 17-03-2008 11:43
Volunteers Needed for a Rookie Competition at Kettering University maltz1881 General Forum 0 06-01-2008 18:44
Robot Cart Questions from a rookie team Alex Minot Technical Discussion 36 06-03-2006 09:20
Kettering University Rookie Robotics Team Alexander McGee General Forum 23 22-12-2004 09:13
Thanks Team 103 from a Rookie Mentor petek Thanks and/or Congrats 0 14-04-2003 13:36


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:38.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi