|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: What do you think of <G22>? | |||
| The rule must go! |
|
6 | 2.21% |
| The rule is bad, but could be fixed. |
|
56 | 20.66% |
| No strong opinion. |
|
14 | 5.17% |
| The rule is good, but could be improved. |
|
101 | 37.27% |
| The rule is fine as it is. |
|
94 | 34.69% |
| Voters: 271. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Overdrive <G22> poll: yea or nay?
G22 has caused some pretty heated debate, and IMO, is ok, but needs to be tweaked. Its causing too many people to get penalties when they are inadvertently breaking the plane, either due to robot rotation, or visibility issues.
I would LIKE to see it changed such that (and yes, I know I'm living in a fantasy world) if less than 50% of the robot crosses the line in the reverse direction AND the robot gains no scoring advantage by doing so (ie. doesnt influence a TRACKBALL, doesn't contact another ROBOT) I dont think the robot should be penalized. I think this modification would keep the intent of the rule intact, while allowing for incidental plane breaking non-consequential to the outcome of the game. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2008 OVERDRIVE poll | Frank Neuperger | General Forum | 6 | 15-01-2008 16:22 |
| pic: Ball of destroyedness.. yea | FlyingDutchman | Extra Discussion | 10 | 02-02-2006 19:54 |
| problems with G22 | JMH | Electrical | 2 | 19-01-2005 20:52 |
| Vote: NYC Off-Season Competition - yay no nay | mtaman02 | Off-Season Events | 0 | 27-05-2004 00:46 |