Go to Post As a real pig farmer*, I definitely endorse team 1902. - Andy Baker [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
View Poll Results: Should there have been a round 4?
Yes 17 14.17%
No 87 72.50%
Undecided 16 13.33%
Voters: 120. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #26   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-03-2008, 13:49
EricVicenti EricVicenti is offline
Registered User
FRC #0008 (Paly Robotics)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Palo Alto Robotics
Posts: 91
EricVicenti has a spectacular aura aboutEricVicenti has a spectacular aura aboutEricVicenti has a spectacular aura about
Re: POLL ONLY. SVR F-3

I would first like to agree that there is nowhere to point the finger. The opposite alliance did nothing to cause this mess, except by playing the best game they could. The referees obviously did the best they could, provided the heat of the moment, and their best understanding of the rules.

I would like to address the argument of the fourth match, however. I was previously unaware the referees have been making that poor call for all of the qualifying rounds. It is the referees job to do the best job they can at calling penalties and tallying points. If a poor call has been made, it is THE TEAM's responsibility to bring it to the judges. I feel it was the judges lack of acknowledging this responsibility that made them feel obligated to seek another match. If they had been making this poor call all day, it was the affected team's responsibility to bring it to the attention of the refs and it was the refs responsibility to change it then. The same applies to the finals.

I believe if teams had brought this fault in point tallying to the attention of the referees on Friday or Saturday morning, they would have corrected their incorrect method of scoring (not counting the trackball while supported by the opposite alliance) earlier on in the competition, and this entire situation would be avoided.
__________________
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Poll Only? Pavan Dave CD Forum Support 5 02-08-2007 08:51
SVR steven114 Thanks and/or Congrats 4 04-04-2004 21:40
chairman's @ svr Matt D Chairman's Award 2 20-02-2004 20:55
Svr... Wetzel Regional Competitions 77 08-04-2003 13:01
No Collusion at SVR Patrick Wang Regional Competitions 14 31-03-2003 23:57


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 15:16.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi