|
Re: Judge's Award
I agree. However, the things that win teams the chairman's award deserve recognition too. I feel that there should be two awards, one a judges award defined more strictly as what you feel it should be, and one as more of a runner up chairman's award, but leave it more open ended, to allow for it to be shifted to more community-type-things based, or more robot-based, depending on what happens at the tournament.
However, keep in mind that something like the school closing you mentioned dosen't happen at each tournament.
__________________
FIRST is not about doing what you can with what you know. It is about doing what you thought impossible, with what you were inspired to become.
2007-2010: Student, FRC 1687, Highlander Robotics
2012-2014: Technical Mentor, FRC 1687, Highlander Robotics
2015-2016: Lead Mentor, FRC 5400, Team WARP
2016-???: Volunteer and freelance mentor-for-hire
|
Maybe next season I want to develop and test a new metric for FRC scouting: Bumper Quality Rating (BQR).
BQR-5: The platonic ideal of FRC bumpers.
...
BQR-0: Moderate to heavy use of duct tape.
I believe BQR would outperform OPR as a predictor of on-field robot performance. - Nate Laverdure [more] 
23-03-2008, 20:44
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode