Go to Post Teamwork gracious professionalism robots = FIRST Robotics - Bcahn836 [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Electrical
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #16   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-03-2008, 07:52
ayeckley's Avatar
ayeckley ayeckley is offline
Registered User
AKA: Alex Yeckley
FRC #2252 (Mavericks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Sandusky, OH
Posts: 268
ayeckley has a reputation beyond reputeayeckley has a reputation beyond reputeayeckley has a reputation beyond reputeayeckley has a reputation beyond reputeayeckley has a reputation beyond reputeayeckley has a reputation beyond reputeayeckley has a reputation beyond reputeayeckley has a reputation beyond reputeayeckley has a reputation beyond reputeayeckley has a reputation beyond reputeayeckley has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Cim breakers tripping?

It sounds like you (the O.P.) have a very similar drivetrain to ours this year, except that we used two CIMs per wheel. Based on our experiences, I suspect that you've got a combination of issues:

With the low reduction ratio you've got, the robot is probably nominally operating at 50% or less of the no-load speed of the motors. In that scenario, you are dumping a lot of current (more than 40A) into each motor in order to quickly accelerate the robot. If you were to nominally run at a higher fraction of the motor no-load speed (most experienced teams seem to recommend about 75%-80%) then the robot would reach it's top speed quickly, causing the motor input current to drop quickly as well. Less time would be spent drawing over 40A. The drawback is that the top speed isn't as high. In our situation, we found that we could never use the top speed we'd planned on because of the small playfield size. Translation: gear it down if you can, or add a second pair of motors (as others have suggested).

The other possible issue is your control scheme. At one point for us, the encoders which measured our drive wheel velocity failed. That resulted in our velocity-based PID control loops getting very, very confused, and as a result our PWM values would essentially change from 0 to 254 (full rev/full fwd/repeat) at the slightest change in joystick position. You couldn't tell by looking at the robot, since it still accelerated and decelerated normally, but in reality the motors were being asked to change direction 38 times per second. As a result they saw average currents much, much higher than 40A. In our situation, the breakers didn't trip, but the main battery overheated and dropped to about 4V (according to the IFI rep's logged data). Once we switched back to open-loop control, the PWM values changed in a more controlled manner, and we never overheated anything again. If your control system is doing something similar to your PWM values then the problem your are experiencing might be fixable with just a software (or driving style) change. Hope that helps...
__________________

 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
your thoughts on the FP CIM/2.5 CIM motor drive setup versus 2 2.5 CIM motors waialua359 Motors 11 14-12-2007 04:29
Tripping breakers GMKlenklen Technical Discussion 13 19-12-2006 09:43
Tripping 120Amp Andy144 Electrical 26 01-04-2003 09:28
Circuit Breakers: Tripping Al Skierkiewicz Electrical 7 10-04-2002 12:40
tripping breakers/burning motors Ben Mitchell Motors 16 04-02-2002 13:31


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi