QUESTION OF THE WEEK!!!

[archiver]

Posted by nick237.

Engineer on team #237, sie h2o bots, from Watertown high school ct and sieman co.

Posted on 10/2/2000 9:24 PM MST


In Reply to: QUESTION OF THE WEEK!!! posted by Andy Grady on 10/1/2000 8:26 PM MST:




The size of the field would have to be larger by one third, and the logistics of setting the teams would be a nightmare. I dont think the idea would work very well, it would be too confusing.

[archiver]

Posted by Dale.

Coach on team #49, Delphi Knights, from Buena Vista High School and Delphi Automative Saginaw Steering.

Posted on 10/3/2000 9:48 AM MST


In Reply to: QUESTION OF THE WEEK!!! posted by Andy Grady on 10/1/2000 8:26 PM MST:



: Hi all, time again for the question of the week...

: Question 10/1/00: What do you think about the idea of 6 teams on the field at once, either in tri alliances or 3 alliances of 2?

Why 6 why not 8; two teams of 4 playing on a field similar in size to last years. Planning occuring before the match but little or no communication between teams during the match. Teams in an alliance could gain additional points individually by holding scoring points on their robot which could be added to the alliance score. More teams play quicker; individual scores depend on ability to work as an alliance but also rely on individual teams ability to score or keep others from scoring.

[archiver]

Posted by Erin.   [PICTURE: SAME | NEW | HELP]


Other on team ? from ? sponsored by ?.

Posted on 10/4/2000 10:10 AM MST


In Reply to: QUESTION OF THE WEEK!!! posted by Andy Grady on 10/1/2000 8:26 PM MST:



Hey Andy-
why not 2 robots per team and then alliances? hmmmm...