Quote:
Originally Posted by The Lucas
I have been lightly following this thread and its parent (it is time consuming to follow it in depth). One word keeps coming to mind when reading the arguments but I haven't heard anyone say it. I searched that word in both threads and no results. The word I am thinking of is:
parity
If I can just steer the discussion ( aka threadjack  ) a bit and ask:
Do we need parity of competitive skill in FIRST?
If we need it, how would we go about achieving it?
I'll hold my opinions on those questions for a bit because I'm interested in other people's opinions on this. Here are a few of my subjective observations on parity. Parity does seem to vary significantly by game. The 2005-present 3 robot alliances seems to increase parity over the 2 robot alliances.
The NFL believes it needs parity for its fanbase, does FIRST need parity for inspiration? |
Not necessarily for its inspiration but why does everything about the way its run have to soely be about inspiration? I think this program no matter how its run is going to be amazing for inspiration, but then once inside theres no reason things like this cant change for other reasons.
Are we really at the point where the only useful thing we can discuss is Dean's choice in timekeeping apparel? The man has a watch. He uses it to tell time. Do we really care how much it is worth, or who made it? I would be much more interested in what he does, not what he wears. - dlavery [more] 
04-04-2008, 00:08
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode