|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2008 Final Championship Divisions
Does anyone know where all the division userbars are?
-q |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2008 Final Championship Divisions
Archimedes: 987/1024 over 71/365
Curie: 16/67 over 33/118 Galileo: 25/103 over 217/1114 (or 254/330?) Newton: 233/968 over 111/175 Whoever wins Galileo wins it all. Somebody else joins Beatty in the multiple win club. You heard it here first. ![]() |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2008 Final Championship Divisions
Quote:
We actually were all together in a match for an epic 138 score! As the Hawaiians would say.....Hana Hou! (One more time!) ![]() |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2008 Final Championship Divisions
That was pretty sweet. . .
Seems that people are forgetting that 2056 is in Newton, as well. They have been a dominating team this year, as well. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2008 Final Championship Divisions
so... this is final?
|
|
#6
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: 2008 Final Championship Divisions
Read the disclaimer in the initial post on this thread.
This info is coming from the official FIRST team list, but until they post the team lists for each division to the "Championship Event Info" page, you can't consider it to be truly official. Knowing everyone's penchant to refresh the team list every five minutes around this time of year, it would be extreme folly for FIRST to populate the division column of the team list and let the entire world view it if they weren't 100% certain that information was final and valid. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2008 Final Championship Divisions
Rochester is gonna ROCK Curie!!!
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2008 Final Championship Divisions
Quote:
and didn't Newton end up winning the whole thing? |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2008 Final Championship Divisions
and newton was stacked the year before, and archimedes ended up taking it home. Its hard to pick against stacked divisions, but many times what happens is the super teams get broken up because of a 1st seeder thats not quite up to par with the rest. Decent team, with some decent luck = super alliance breaker uppers. But there may just be too many good teams to see this happen.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2008 Final Championship Divisions
Archimedes watchers should also look out for RUSH (27)
As for Curie last year... interesting things happened. |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2008 Final Championship Divisions
i think gali will have the best matches, but in the end, newton will win it.... as much as i hate to say that, all the key stats that i look at say that.... look in the OPR thread for more info
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2008 Final Championship Divisions
Wow, for my first year going to Championships, this is looking to turn into an awesome time thanks to all of these amazing teams. Can't wait to see you all. Good luck everyone
![]() |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2008 Final Championship Divisions
God, I hope you're right. I'm just glad that with how stacked Galileo is that only 2 of the powerhouses will make it out alive to continue on to Einstein, evening the field a little. (unless one of them somehow makes it around to a 2nd round pick). There are going to be uber-strong alliances coming out of every division. Now it's time to go crazy waiting for the match list!!!! Only 6 more days until I get to head down!!!!!
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2008 Final Championship Divisions
Ok we got some going earlier...but here's the question
Which 3 team alliance would you like to see represent your division on Einstein? A couple guidelines: 1) Of course we'd like to see our own team up there, but leave that to other people to decide. Vote for someone else, spread the love 2) Make them "Realistic". What I mean, we all know that 365, 1124, and 1024 aren't going to be on an alliance together (no offense to these teams...but there's no way that one of those three will be around for the second round). Any thoughts? Last edited by George A. : 10-04-2008 at 02:17. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2008 Final Championship Divisions
A 987/1124/66 alliance would be very, very scary. 365/1024, 27/71, and 365/525 would also be very strong combos.
EDIT: Above is for Archi. For Galileo, wow. This is almost impossible. As well as I'd think we'd complement most alliances as a third member, I'll refrain for now. Any combination of two of 1114/330/217/254/103/25/469/1717/195 scares me. And to think, it's likely we'll see 4 of those in the eliminations :O And, I haven't mentioned 121, 494, 70, 40, 1629, 343, 1540, ... Wow. What a division. If 148 is still around on the third round, it would make a valuable 3rd alliance member. 980 also showed they know what they're doing as a complement to two hurdlers, as did 84. Last edited by Guy Davidson : 10-04-2008 at 02:31. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2008 Championship Divisions | Koko Ed | Rumor Mill | 12 | 18-01-2008 16:53 |
| championship divisions | seraphim33 | Championship Event | 4 | 02-04-2007 11:45 |
| 4 or 6 Championship Divisions? | Starke | General Forum | 20 | 06-04-2006 11:00 |
| Divisions at Championship? | Raul | Rumor Mill | 102 | 28-04-2004 07:58 |
| Championship Divisions? | Ken Loyd | General Forum | 0 | 21-03-2004 21:53 |