|
Re: Picking Teams
Another way to describe the dilemma:
Does a team has an obligation to break-up a super-alliance in the selection process, giving their own alliance a better chance of winning their Division?
OR
Should a team's loyalty extend beyond themselves to helping insure their Division wins the Championship?
Who can fault a team wanting to achieve their highest level of success at an event? Would you criticize a team for NOT breaking up a potential super-alliance given the opportunity?
What is the GP thing to do?
That's a personal choice and it's NOT GP to criticize that choice.
__________________
"There's never enough time to do it right, but always time to do it over."
2003 AZ: Semifinals, Motorola Quality; SoCal: Q-finals, Xerox Creativity; IRI: Q-finals
2004 AZ: Semifinals, GM Industrial Design; SoCal: Winners, Leadership in Controls; Championship: Galileo #2 seed, Q-finals; IRI: Champions
2005 AZ: #1 Seed, Xerox Creativity; SoCal: Finalist, RadioShack Controls; SVR: Winners, Delphi "Driving Tomorrow's Technologies"; Championship: Archimedes Semifinals; IRI: Finalist
2007 LA: Finalist; San Diego: Q-finals; CalGames: Finalist || 2008 San Diego: Q-finals; LA: Winners; CalGames: Finalist || 2009 LA: Semifinals; Las Vegas: Q-finals; IRI: #1 Seed, Finalist
2010 AZ: Motorola Quality; LA: Finalist || 2011 SD: Q-finals; LA: Q-finals || 2013 LA: Xerox Creativity, WFFA, Dean's List Finalist || 2014 IE: Q-finals, LA: Finalist, Dean's List Finalist
2016 Ventura: Q-finals, WFFA, Engineering Inspiration
|
The part I like best is your method of transfering the torque via the balls. Very elegant. - Joe Johnson [more] 
12-04-2008, 22:27
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode