|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Curie Division 2008
To make any bold predictions you would have to see a couple of quailifing matches to start to get an idea of whos robobts are capatible with who.
As example.. At GLR we wouldn't have wanted to be on an alliance with the martians (70, 494) because we felt that we would have to many automous problems of running into each other. Also with rush (27) we weren't a really able to play their style of offenise they wanted us to play. With HOT (67) we were able to qucikly help them get balls down for them to have one to hurdle, also in three matches we had atleset 30 point autons (one being a lovely 60 points). So i say once see acouple of matches you'll have a better idea of who can work with who. But i'll give you a small prediction of a good alliance that could take Curie and put a strong fight on Einstien.. If 67/326/33 were on any allaince its over...Some qucik stats 67- Winner GLR, hurdle 4-5, 4 to 5 lines in auton 326- Winner GLR, hurdle 2-3, run 7-8 laps, 4 to 5 lines in auton maybe a ball or two 33- Semifinalest in all 3 reginoals, hurdle 4 to 5, get 3-4 lines in auton Perfect matches with these three teams (and both balls down in auton) possible scores of : 152 (w/o 326 hurding and runnig laps playing defense) 4 hurdles by 33/67= 80 points 5 laps by 326= 10 points perfect auton 67=16 points 33=16 points 326= 32 points(with two balls down) But this is all totally a unlikely happening, 326 or 33 being a 3rd round pick is very unlikely, but who knows. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Curie Division is Awesome | Eugenia Gabrielov | Championship Event | 60 | 15-04-2005 15:04 |
| Curie Division Collaborators Wanted | archiver | 2001 | 1 | 24-06-2002 03:11 |
| Curie Division!!! | archiver | 2001 | 3 | 24-06-2002 03:07 |
| Curie Division | purplehaze357 | Championship Event | 18 | 19-04-2002 12:38 |