|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#256
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2008
agreed, I have to say, that charles is alright for a little bit, but hes repeatative talking gets on my nerves after a while, but these matches are intense!! so I don't really care lol
|
|
#257
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2008
Quote:
![]() |
|
#258
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2008
Wow, tomorrow morning is gonna make things very interesting.
176, 1114 and 330 are the only 3 undefeated teams (1983 has a tie), with 1114 and 330 tied only .4 RS points behind 176. 176 has much tougher matches tomorrow, being paired against teams such as 254, 121 and 384, and not being with any powerhouse teams besides 148, so they could very well end up 6-1 or 5-2 by lunch tomorrow. The real question is can either 330 or 1114 stay undefeated through their last two matches tomorrow to guarantee one picking the other? The match everyone is talking about with 1114 vs 254 is stacked against Simbotics, but with their high scoring and reliable auto mode they might be able to pull of a win, and their other match should be just like their first 5 have been. My guess is 330 will be the only undefeated team left by the time selections come around, although their last match is vs 217, which could stop their undefeated streak as well. It's gonna be an interesting morning tomorrow, which I will be waking up at 5:45 am pacific time to watch ![]() |
|
#259
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2008
Quote:
By the way, from the match schedules thread, here are the predicted seeding numbers: Quote:
|
|
#260
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2008
Andy Grady is the man. I got to cover for him in CT and had a great time. He was Emcee in CT last year too and did a great job.
And yesterday was his birthday ![]() |
|
#261
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2008
Hey wow, that algorithm is almost spot on so far for us. We ended up in 13th (predicted 16th), and we the one match we lost, we pretty much knew it from the getgo (against 330, 494, and 1138, and I have to say I thought our alliance put up a hell of a fight, though, us getting our D on and 694 hurdling like they did in NYC). We have a relatively easy schedule being that we only have to face a few of the rediculous powerhouses that I know this division has. I'm dropping my jaw seeing some of these teams play.
we were just excited that our hybrid's in full-working order now. |
|
#262
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2008
It's interesting that 254 & 1114 are similar and 217 & 330 are similar and they each face each other in a match.
Personally, I'd like to see 1114 and 330 seed 1st and 2nd (either order) and each would pick one of 254/217. After that, hopefully they meet in division finals for some intense matches ![]() |
|
#263
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2008
Quote:
|
|
#264
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2008
Quote:
![]() No, whether or not it will work, that's another question. Knowing 1114, probably not However, we'll give it a shot.Last edited by Guy Davidson : 18-04-2008 at 22:10. |
|
#265
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2008
Quote:
Last edited by Alex_2487 : 18-04-2008 at 22:38. |
|
#266
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2008
There's a very slim but statistically possible way that this whole division could fall apart. Imagine this...
176 (now undefeated), loses their one match against poofs but finishes 6 and 1. 330 loses to 217 (and also end up 6 and 1) 1114 loses to 254/469 (and also end up 6 and 1) !!! Now it's all up to qualifying points. 176 is *already* ahead by a touch. Just imagine that they stay #1. Now... 176 asks 1114 who refuses, then asks 330 and 254 who refuse, then asks 217 who has to accept. There's your first power team out. Since 1114, 330 and 254 all refused, they can't ask each other and therefore can't team up. Ouch! Mind you, I *REALLY* don't want this to happen. I happen to have some good friends on those 4 teams above but just looking at the numbers, wouldn't that be an insane outcome? Last edited by FoleyEngineer : 18-04-2008 at 23:01. |
|
#267
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2008
1114, 65, 234 v. 254, 469,8
Looks to be the blockbuster. Everyone is saying that 1114 v. 254 is what to watch, BUT, 469 is in there aswell, and id have to give them credit for 4-5 atleast. I sense a high combined score here ![]() 160-150? *Edit* I would like to change this to 120-110* ![]() may the best alliance win. Last edited by 65_Xero_Huskie : 18-04-2008 at 23:07. |
|
#268
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2008
Quote:
|
|
#269
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2008
I think the key is not counting out team 8. If they cant strategize and beat them successfully (1114) i.e. slow them down, trap the ball, etc. then who can? Slowing down 1114 will be significant if it can be done since the other alliance can score at will also.
To the other comment about the scenario that could break up the alliance, how ironic is it that Aces High are in the mix again similar to that of Newton 2006! If 330 wins out, the alliance will be set with 1114 and 330. 330 picking 1114 as a #1 pick is a guarantee and 1114 accepting should be a guarantee. Accepting means its a guaranteed strong alliance versus them declining and taking whoever 330 doesn't take. With all of the hype this year about 1114, I had to see them for myself in a match. They are the team 25 of 2006 and I am a believer now! My last scenario would be the most interesting. What if 1114 ends up at #1 and takes 254? That would be such a strong alliance that if they should win the championship title, they would both be the two most strongest teams to have finally won a title! ![]() Last edited by waialua359 : 18-04-2008 at 23:54. |
|
#270
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2008
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2008 Division Predictions | zivo123 | General Forum | 3 | 31-03-2008 15:34 |
| Galileo Division 2007 | seraphim33 | Championship Event | 69 | 17-04-2007 01:42 |
| Galileo Division | Katie Atiyeh | Thanks and/or Congrats | 0 | 14-04-2003 01:02 |
| Galileo Division | archiver | 2001 | 7 | 24-06-2002 03:10 |