|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 2009 Control System, Mounted
Quote:
So there may still be hope for the kit frame next year... |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2009 Control System, Mounted
I'm not going to lie to you guys but the power block wire connectors are so strong that the people from Diversified Systems put batter wire on it and pulled a full size 120 lbs robot around without the wire pulling out. The wire was only a foot long, it was amazing.
![]() |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2009 Control System, Mounted
It's not the initial strength. It's the resistance to vibration. Since there's no WAY that thing could be any worse than the din rail (we zip tied the wires to ours so they wouldn't vibrate loose), then it has to be an improvement!
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 2009 Control System, Mounted
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
However, smaller gauge wire does not have as much of a retention force. With a 12AWG wire, I only managed to move the robot a few inches. In fact, I could easily pull it out by simply wrapping it around my hand several times, giving it a few inches of slack and then yanking the giggles out of it. Unfortunately, I smacked my arm into the robot during said yanking. Ouch. Don't count on those WAGOs on the PD as a structural element, but boy do I love them! |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2009 Control System, Mounted
although it is a lot bigger than the IFI control system, who says that FIRST isn't going to allow larger robots, or even heavier ones? i really think robot design wont be the same any more.
|
|
#21
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 2009 Control System, Mounted
The robots are already about as large as they can be and still fit through a standard doorway. They are already about as heavy as they can be and still be carried safely by two high school students. I don't expect the size and weight limits to be increased. I wouldn't be surprised if the rules next year called for smaller robots.
|
|
#22
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 2009 Control System, Mounted
Quote:
|
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 2009 Control System, Mounted
A robot with a battery and bumpers mounted could be up to 120 + 12 + 15 = 147 lbs. At least, that's if I remember correctly, and the battery weights about 15 lbs. So I don't see much room to add weight, if we wish to remain within OSHA regulations.
|
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2009 Control System, Mounted
I thought the distribution block/fuse block length was customizable, i dont wanna waste all that space that could be used for something else...
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NEW 2009 Control System Released | qnetjoe | FRC Control System | 296 | 15-08-2008 15:02 |
| 2009 Control System Possibility? | Racer26 | Rumor Mill | 121 | 25-04-2008 09:05 |
| New System for 2009 | Lafleur | Programming | 1 | 17-04-2008 21:45 |
| pic: Team 116 Modular Control System | dlavery | Robot Showcase | 42 | 21-10-2007 11:15 |
| 2009 control board? | Stuart | Rumor Mill | 4 | 14-05-2007 19:01 |