|
|
|
 Don't take my questions negatively, I just hold drive trains to a ridiculous standard. - AdamHeard [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating: 
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
| Don't take my questions negatively, I just hold drive trains to a ridiculous standard. - AdamHeard [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#27
24-04-2008, 11:53
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Next year's game?
Anything but floppies...
Maybe we could use HD-DVD's... they seem to be really cheap right now  The thing I really like in a game is different robot classes. 2007 was interesting because there were two completely different objectives and robots needed to rely on eachother to do both. This year, this wasnt the case. 2004 was interesting because there was like 740 objectives and 2 robots to do it with. 2006 was a fun game in the aspect that we were doing something different than any prior game (shooting) but I still have to say that 2007 was better. If we could do 4 or 5 objectives in 2004 with 2 robots on an alliance, I don't see why 4 or 5 scoring options couldn't be done with 3 robots on an alliance. I would like to see a little variety. I like the idea of an easy scoring option, but I think there needs to be a need for a few options. Last edited by AndyB : 24-04-2008 at 11:56. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| On Game Design | Matt Leese | General Forum | 38 | 30-04-2004 19:08 |
| Poll:Use of Mobile Goals in This Year's Game | MisterX | General Forum | 12 | 28-03-2004 23:10 |
| The key to this year's game (long) | archiver | 2001 | 6 | 23-06-2002 23:05 |
| do you like this years game | archiver | 2001 | 8 | 23-06-2002 22:29 |
| How was this years game compared to others? | Anthony S. | General Forum | 7 | 13-06-2001 15:43 |
Threaded Mode