|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [FTC]: Tips for Teams going to the Vex Championships
Quote:
And this reminds me, Our team, Twisted Bots, owes a big THANK YOU to Blake and his team for loaning us batteries to get us through the finals. Ours gave up. Blake, Could you please post details on the battery charger that discharges the batteries so they work better? Thanks, Jon T Coach Team 177 Twisted Bots |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Tips for Teams going to the Vex Championships
Quote:
1) I didn't spot your question when you first posted it. This answer is wordy; but hopefully it is also worth reading. 2) You were very welcome! 3) For as long as I can remember NiCad batteries being around, I have heard about something called the memory effect. There are other similar names for it. Whatever it is called there is a real observable effect that can bite you in a competition. The bottom line is that drawing just a little of a NiCad cell's stored charge out and then recharging that cell, tends to decrease the total amount of current you can draw out of the cell in later uses. Doing that over and over again (take out a little charge and then put a little charge back into the cell). will drastically reduce the amount of charge you can withdraw from the cell. Using a multi-cell Vex 7.2V Battery in a single competition might hypothetically pull about (2.5/60)Hrs * 4000 mAmps = 167 mAmpHrs out of it (the actual amount drained will typically be significantly less). The Vex 7.2V batteries are designed to hold 2000 mAmpHrs (mAH) of charge. If after using a battery in a single match (or after a period of light use during a team meeting) you slap it into a charger and replace those 167 mAH; and if you do this a over and over again, after a while, the battery is not going to be able to supply 2000 mAH. In fact, I predict that it is going to fail at supplying even the full 167 mAH (or significantly less!) that you have been pulling out and putting back in. The failure will be manifested in a very dramatic drop in the Voltage the battery can sustain across its output terminals. The result of that voltage drop under load is something that I/we covered in earlier messages in this thread. It is very difficult (well nigh impossible without meticulous measuring and record keeping) to tell the difference between a battery (#1) that sustains 7.8V under no load, but that only has 200-300 mAH available and will suffer a dramatic voltage drop if asked to supply much those mAH quickly to satisfy a high load; and a battery (#2) that shows 7.9V under no load, but will be able to keep its voltage up pretty high while supplying the 167 mAH (max) needed in a match (because the battery is able to supply nearly 2000 mAH if necessary, and its voltage won't drop badly until the charge is nearly exhausted). This "memory effect" is, at least partially, reversible. You reverse it in essentially the same way that you avoid it in the first place; by draining a cell before you recharge it. Always attempt to completely exhaust a battery before recharging it. It is exhausted when applying a load causes the battery's voltage to drop quickly (from >7V down toward 5V and lower). In a Vex robot, a sign of this will be seeing the microcontroller's Red LED (in the eye part of the indicator panel) blink on each time you tell a motor to do some substantial work (like move the bot around). Another way to exhaust a battery will be to use a commercial charger/discharger. These should have circuitry that prevents you from draining any of the battery's cells all the way down to 0.0V. According to my charger's manual, draining them that low can damage the ones that reach 0V first by causing current to flow backwards through them. Using a big resister or other "dumb" device to drain a battery of cells is another method but it is not recommended for the reason cited in the paragraph immediately above. Discharging a battery that is in good condition, before recharging it will help keep it in good condition. A battery that is in bad condition because of often being partially discharged and then recharged; can be brought back to some measure of its original health (capacity) by running it through many "deep" discharge, then recharge, cycles. I have some batteries that I got from eBay that don't hold the full 2000mAH that they should. They have improved a bit as I have run them through many discharge/recharge cycles; but they are still far from holding the 2000mAH that they should. They might have permanently lost some of their storage capacity. Others have become dramatically better after running through several cycles. ----------------------------------------------- Related but separate topic. I bought a SuperBrain 977 charger so that I could keep track of how much charge each of my batteries can hold. The 977 has a clumsy user interface; but that said, it lets me do the following:
----------------------------------------------------- Blake PS: Some teams (including mine) bad-mouthed their batteries incorrectly - I think that we were suffereing from overheating motors, and the symptoms looked like exhausted batteries - When I checked the batteries on the charger/discharger, they were doing fine - They could supply lots of Amps for far longer than one match without a dramatic voltage drop. Last edited by gblake : 04-05-2008 at 19:37. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Teams going to the Massachusetts FTC Championship regional | astephen68 | General Forum | 1 | 17-02-2008 18:53 |
| [FTC]: Two Divisions at FTC World Championships! | KathieK | FIRST Tech Challenge | 0 | 05-02-2008 15:31 |
| [FTC]: Hey FTC teams, Vex and a chance to be on MTV? | Rich Kressly | FIRST Tech Challenge | 1 | 12-09-2007 13:35 |
| White Paper Discuss: "18 Tips for in the Pits for FIRST Teams" | RoboMom | Extra Discussion | 2 | 11-02-2006 19:42 |
| For the teams that will go to championships | SpaceOsc | Rules/Strategy | 0 | 13-04-2002 05:37 |