Go to Post Although it is tempting, try not to toot your own horn in this thread. While you may have an awesome bot, the real compliment should come from other teams. - Andy Baker [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-05-2008, 15:10
Daniel_LaFleur's Avatar
Daniel_LaFleur Daniel_LaFleur is offline
Mad Scientist
AKA: Me
FRC #2040 (DERT)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 1,972
Daniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Daniel_LaFleur
Re: Problem with Penalties

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hachiban VIII View Post
FIRST has plenty of rules without penalties. For instance, your only allowed 4 CIMs on the robot. You can't slap an extra CIM on there in return for an extra 10 pt. penalty every match... That would be crazy...
I beg to differ. The penaly for the above infraction is to not get qualified (IE no inspection sticker) or a DQ if found later on. I see this as a far stricter penalty

Now back to XaulZan11's initial post.

I agree that there were far too many penalties this year, but I do not blame the game or the rules. I, instead, lay the blame on the teams that did not take into consideration that those rules might be strictly enforced and built their robot without taking into account that not being able to completely control your robot might actually hurt your alliance.

In the 15 matchs that 1824 played in, we got 1 penalty (yeah a <G22>). Yet we lost many matches because our alliance partners got many (as many as 4 ).

The only issue I have with the penalties this year was that for some teams it was better if they didn't show up (scorewise). And that is just plain wrong.
__________________
___________________
"We are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven; that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts, Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. "
- Tennyson, Ulysses
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem with idata_user_routines.o? Adrien Programming 3 12-02-2006 01:33
Bot blocks field with arm in LZ - Penalties? Swampdude Rules/Strategy 8 02-03-2005 15:00
Problem with RoboEmu2? Calvin Programming 1 12-02-2005 11:27
Problem with communicating with STAMP through serial port Skabana159 Technical Discussion 2 06-02-2003 21:10
Problem with OI / RC Jay Lundy Technical Discussion 2 29-03-2002 23:07


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:05.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi