|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 2009 robot idea
You want to shoot for around 120 degrees of chain wrap as a minimum and I think with your current run, you will see major slippage problems with you center axle.
Try moving your tensioners inward or split it into two separate chain runs. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2009 robot idea
yeah, i guess i didnt make that clear enough, there would be a separate chain going in each direction
![]() ![]() |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2009 robot idea
this is the classic thread of one infected with the FIRST bug. i love it!
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 2009 robot idea
Oh, sorry. Looks good then. I know you designed this to fit the supershifter gearbox, but it might be easier to make if you used 4" tall sides instead of 5".
With 5" sides, you would need to order plate and cut it to length and width. With 4" sides, you can just purchase 4"x3/16" Extruded Flat Bar and cut it to length. I guess if your gonna CNC or waterjet them anyways, it isn't that big of a deal, but I'm pretty sure flat bar is cheaper than plate anyways. (I can not find 5"x3/16" extrusion anywhere). |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2009 robot idea
Looks good, nice and simple like it should be. I'd prefer just using dead axles in this particular set up for the end wheels, it would probably cheaper and easier to build. Either way, it looks like a very solid drivetrain.
Does anybody else notice the trend lately of putting the wheels between two plates held together with standoffs? I may be imagining, but there seem to be a lot of teams using this method recently... |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2009 robot idea
I agree there has been a trend for this and we are guilty of it as well. I have tried many different drivetrains and this method (2 plates with standoffs) really seems to be the best one I have done. It is particularly good if you are sponsored by or have access to sheetmetal stuff aka Laser or waterjet because the entire frame for the drivetrain can be knocked out in a couple hours. Also it allows for really quick assembly and wheel changes as well as it is super easy to incorporate the transmission into the frame, thus reducing weight.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2009 robot idea
One thing - I always like keep things simple and easy with few parts.
Have you considered just using aluminum C-channel (or even square tubing) for the left and right areas where the wheels are? A hole saw can make quick weight savings holes, and you don't need the fasteners, the machining, etc. It's stronger, lighter, and easier to make. Just a suggestion. |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 2009 robot idea
Quote:
![]() It's two, with about 180 degrees for each chain and sprocket. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: 2009 Control System, Mounted | Billfred | FRC Control System | 23 | 01-05-2008 19:02 |
| pic: 2009 Distribution Block | Billfred | FRC Control System | 16 | 22-04-2008 17:16 |
| Idea to elevate robot. | Gboehm | Pneumatics | 4 | 14-01-2007 15:15 |
| Real cool Robot Idea | Marcel | Rules/Strategy | 17 | 27-02-2006 20:21 |
| Robot competition business idea | Swampdude | General Forum | 6 | 16-03-2005 16:05 |