Red dots

[Molten]

Red dots have been used more and more for simple disagreement. I have yet to find a good reason to give a red dot. If there is no reason to give them, why do we have them? I am not saying that we should get rid of all dots. Just the red dots. It is my opinion that they are promoting conflict among those of CD. If we were to keep the green dots and get rid of the red. We could still say "that was a great post" and not say "that was a lousy post". I know that similar topics have arised in the past, but I think now is the time to rethink it given the increase in conflicts.

[Michelle Celio]

Originally Posted by Molten

Red dots have been used more and more for simple disagreement. I have yet to find a good reason to give a red dot. If there is no reason to give them, why do we have them? I am not saying that we should get rid of all dots. Just the red dots. It is my opinion that they are promoting conflict among those of CD. If we were to keep the green dots and get rid of the red. We could still say "that was a great post" and not say "that was a lousy post". I know that similar topics have arised in the past, but I think now is the time to rethink it given the increase in conflicts.

My only advice...ignore the dots. They are just that, dots, dots to relate to an irrelevant number that means nothing in your everyday life. If someone doesn't like your post and gives you a red dot, send them a PM back and talk to them about it.

Yes there have been many discussions on the subject of reputation on these forums and really all you can get out of them is "They're just dots"

[Kyle Love]

"They're just dots."

[Joe G.]

They are just dots.

That being said, the only times I will negative rep is when

1. I am particularly frustrated with a spambot
2. Someone posts something, not just a opinion I disagree with, or a simple incorrect fact, but something blatantly disrespectful, like a personal attack, and then posts again refusing to apologise. Take this thread for example. I only negative repped after the second post. In general, I also only do this when multiple posts have appeared suggesting that I am far from alone in my impression that the post is hugely disrespectful.

I've both recieved and given positive reps for anything from a simple joke to a long thought-out analysis of something, even if we disagree on the matter, such as mentor-student build.

I haven't yet recieved any negative rep here (then again, I've only been actively posting here for about a year and a half). I got one on another forum for posting in a word association game thread, with the message "forumgames sux." The truth is, many people are just too quick in pushing that "add to reputation" button. Sometimes I wish that CDs software would tell us this before, rather than after adding reputation.

[Mike Schroeder]

wait what dots...?

[Cory]

I think it was Andy who said "they're just dots" (Someone please correct me, if I'm wrong).

It's true. If you get one for a petty reason, shrug it off, chalk it up to the person being a jerk, and move on.

Just as there are good reasons to give positive reputation, there are good reasons to give bad reputation. Go reverse sort members by reputation. It's immediately going to show you people who are either trouble makers, or cannot communicate their thoughts without resorting to personal attacks and inappropriate discussion.

It's a relatively useless metric anyways. I don't choose who's posts to read based on the reputation they have.

I know many whom have only a small amount of reputation. These people are often ones we should all look up to, and take note whenever they post; even though they don't post as frequently as some, their insight is unparalleled.

I know there's some users who have massive amounts of reputation who's posts I glance at, or don't read at all.

My point is that the number of dots doesn't matter. What it comes down to is that if you write well thought out posts that avoid personal attacks and denigrating others, people will take notice, even if you have very few. If you post inane drivel, people will take notice as well, and ignore you.

[GaryVoshol]

Originally Posted by rocketperson44

I haven't yet recieved any negative rep here (then again, I've only been actively posting here for about a year and a half).

Oooo, ya want some? We can arrange that!

[Steve W]

To give or not to give that is the question. Red dots have been given by me and taken as well. When I got them (it was a whole bunch by only a couple of people) It made me think and reconsider my approach. Red dots were good. I have given only a couple of times (once just to smarten a team member up) and followed up with a PM.

When I see a person get lots of neg rep I read their posts, Give positive rep and try to help the person out with what went wrong. So far this has worked pretty well. Again, red dots good.

They are just dots but can be a great tool if used properly. My vote keep it as it is.

[artdutra04]

It is not just that one's views may contradict those of the thread at hand, it is more often how those ideas are presented.

I've only received negative reputation once*. Seriously.

And I've disagreed with a lot of people.

If you find yourself often receiving the red dots of doom, then start a series of private messages with the people who sent them your way. See what it was that made them decide that.

Sometimes (and I know I've been guilty of this once), people make mistakes and may overreact to a message. They may be in a hurry or having a bad day, and read through the thread quickly and may miss a critical part of a post, a part which lacking from the original post can me it take an entirely different attitude.

If they end up not having a valid reason, or stating that they just disagree with your ideas, then report it to the moderators as an abuse of the reputation system.

A society without contrasting ideas will never move forward; however those contrasting ideas must be based on fact, must be rational/logical, and must be presented in a respectful manner. As long as all posts adhere to those guidelines, there should never be a need for negative reputation.



*And it ended up being something which the other user thought I was wrong about a particular aspect of shop safety. I really didn't care, as I knew that my advice was 100% in line with that of all OSHA and industry-approved safety guidelines, but it was one area where I thought that FIRST had gone way overboard in their quest for "safety". But that's another topic for another day...

[EricH]

Originally Posted by Molten

Red dots have been used more and more for simple disagreement.

And green dots are often used for simple agreement. I can think of reasons to give reds, but I usually don't because it's obvious that the "offenders" have already gotten plenty.

If you have a simple agreement or disagreement, there are some other ways to communicate it. Neutral rep, for instance. Or PMs.

Or you could just ignore the rep system altogether.

Edit: I'm with Joe on why I'd give any negative rep. I never have given any, though. In at least a couple of cases, I've been glad of it later. Typically, everyone else beats me to it, and I figure enough is enough.

[Madison]

Originally Posted by Molten

Red dots have been used more and more for simple disagreement.

You have no visibility whatsoever into how others are using the reputation system.

[dtengineering]

I really like the rep system. Yeah, they're just dots... but not only is it cool to have a way to congratulate someone on making a really meaningful post, but it was really kind of fun as a newbie on CD to see that others thought I was making meaningful posts and watch that little rep bar grow. Heck, it is still fun!

So I think there is a strong argument in favour of "green dots". Yeah, they are just dots, but what they represent in the way of a model to recognize community contributions is, I think, significant.

As for the red dots, the fact that they are so rarely used says a lot about the CD community. This is a pretty positive place. Yes, we could probably get by without them... and sure, they are probably used inappropriately sometimes... but there are times when they do serve a purpose and allow a small symbolic protest against rude, obnoxious, or repeatedly incorrect posts.

I think the system actually works pretty well... not perfectly, but pretty well... and do glance at a poster's rep bar. Since we lack the many unconcious signals that we get in face to face communication it is just one more indicator that can help us sort out who is posting and how we can best reply to their post.

Yeah, they are just dots... but I don't know too many people who've got a big green line of them who got there by accident!

Jason

[JesseK]

Red dots keep our less proud moments in check.

The way I've seen them used (and sparingly used them in return) is as a tactful way to privately tell someone not that they're wrong, but that they're being inappropriately unprofessional about what they're saying.

[Nica F.]

Originally Posted by dtengineering

I Yeah, they are just dots, but what they represent in the way of a model to recognize community contributions is, I think, significant.

Agreed.

To answer the question,
If I were to give negative rep, I would only give it when someone is being incredibly rude. Putting down a team, talking negatively about one's appearance in a thread, and calling other people names. It's the type of thing where I think they are being offensive and could possibly hurt the feelings of another FIRSTer. And this of course is not common at all in CD forums and thats why it's not really a big deal for me.

Something to understand is that everyone has their own opinions and if they differ from yours, it doesn't necessarily mean that they're wrong.

As for negative rep given to me, I've only gotten it once from someone I gave negative rep to for being rude to multiple teams. The comment that came with his negative rep was rude as well, go figure.

[Ryan Dognaux]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19rVKy_pfFU

You agitating my dots?