|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#151
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New FIRST competition structure in Michigan
Quote:
Again, that lustre, however it is defined, should not be lost. |
|
#152
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New FIRST competition structure in Michigan
Quote:
Personally, I hope this pilot works out well for all in Michigan, but this may be a case of trying to do too much with FRC rather than working to create a tiered system and fitting the school into what they can afford/accomplish/support. |
|
#153
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: New FIRST competition structure in Michigan
This makes me want to go see a Michigan event (are they still considered regionals ?) even more just to see what the new format looks like.
|
|
#154
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: New FIRST competition structure in Michigan
One thing about volunteering.
I have a limited amount of vacation time that I can spend on FIRST (for some reason my wife expects me to spend some with her.) Eliminating the Thursday will give me an extra day to volunteer at another event. I'm pretty excited about that. |
|
#155
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: New FIRST competition structure in Michigan
Quote:
< has no life. |
|
#156
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: New FIRST competition structure in Michigan
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#157
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: New FIRST competition structure in Michigan
FIRST doesn't want VEX or Tech in Michigan. Plain and simple. They have told us this. VEX or Tech is more for states like N. Dakota, Kansas, etc. We tried to get an "offical" VEX Tourney here. They told us no. We did hold a tourney anyways but it wasn't with the blessings from FIRST. I will say the 1 1st year it was held they allowed a few teams to go to the championship. They won't allow that anymore though.
By the way I take great offense to calling the Kettering Rookie Event amateurish. You just insulted about 1000 people including the teams that attended. BTW I have 2 things to say about your comment. 1 of those rookies took 3rd place at the Championship. 2. Paul Godonus (?) was there (in case you didn't recognize him in the picture) along with Fracois Castaing and other top officals who attended TOTALLY disagreed with you. They told all of us during a luncheon that he was shocked by how well it ran. He also told us that we gave 95% of everything that a regular regional gives for 1/15 of the cost. Please don't put words into my mouth by saying we "borrowed a used amp from an uncle's garage". We used top notch material. Kettering has professional video cameras etc.. I really don't understand such negativity. It is a good thing to step out of your comfort zone and see the rest of the world. ![]() |
|
#158
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New FIRST competition structure in Michigan
Quote:
I know there are a lot of I's in this post, but I have many friends in Michigan, as I've said, who are very upset with having to do this. [My last post here.] |
|
#159
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New FIRST competition structure in Michigan
$5000 intial fee (KOP and 2 district competitions)
$4000 State Championship $4000 Out of state competition $5000 FIRST Championship This payment structure may suggest that the entry fee for all teams may have gone down $1,000. Is this true or is it just wishfull thinking for the rest of us. Also I have my own thoughts on why they are allowing 18 or so teams to advance to the world championships from the MI State championships however I was wondering what others thought of this? |
|
#160
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: New FIRST competition structure in Michigan
The 18 teams advancing to the Championship reflects the 18 teams that previously advanced from Great Lakes, West Michigan and Detroit Regionals. Granted, two teams from Indiana qualified from West Michigan this year. But teams from Michigan qualified from other regionals, which will be still be possible but less likely in the future.
|
|
#161
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New FIRST competition structure in Michigan
Quote:
|
|
#162
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: New FIRST competition structure in Michigan
Quote:
You can't just choose to make sure the robot will be working better than normal. Not once has our team ever slacked off because we knew we would have Thursday to finish the bot. Every year for the last 3 years we have slept in our lab from Thursday night to Tuesday morning, in an effort to finish our robot. There was nothing in any of those years we could have done to be more prepared for Thursday of the event. Stuff happens, and Thursday is invaluable for many teams. Eliminating Thursday won't hurt teams like 254, because we would be able to accomplish more in our own shop than at the event, but it will hurt the teams that need the help the most-those that show up, with all kinds of work to do, with a 30 lb overweight robot that isn't totally put together. With the current setup, other teams at the event will take notice of said team struggling, and help them to be ready come Friday morning. Now those teams will be forced to do it all themselves in 8 hours, instead of 12, with no other teams around for help. |
|
#163
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New FIRST competition structure in Michigan
Don’t get me wrong, I hate to loose Thursday too but if it’s a choice between having Thursday or having two events I will take the two events and make the adjustment during build weather we like it or not. If all the other teams are in the same boat than the difficulty will be equal. I do not believe for one minute that any team slacks off during build but I do believe in the ability of the teams to adjust. If we were given four weeks to build we would find a way.
|
|
#164
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New FIRST competition structure in Michigan
The ONLY DOWNSIDE I see to losing thursday is getting all of the inspections done before playtime. The last 5 years and maybe beyond( Iwasn't around yet) our machines have been put in the crate, competition ready and are ready to roll on thursday morning. I would pick the 8 hours at school in our machine shop over 12 hours in a smoking hot gym/arena anyways. I look at cutting the thursdays as a cost savings. Just remember that this is just an EXPERIMENT it won't be perfect, but anything that you do for the first time in most cases isn't perfect anyways. Everything can be improved upon, nothing is perfect. Everyone has thier own ways to do things and Michigan is just trying to improve FIRST in our own way. If the experiment doesn't work then everything will most likely go back to normal in 2010. And for the economy in Michigan: it sucks, sponsors are hard to come by these days here in Michigan. The banners at the top of this page are only $250.00 and most of the students struggle to find anyone interested and it's not about selling the program because most of them would have me convinced, even if I was not involved with FIRST. I was a student also when we first started the ads and it was tough finding a taker for only $250.00 and I can sell the program pretty well to most people. If the economy was rolling and doing pretty well and it wasn't so costly to do FIRST this probably would have never came up. I loved things the way they were and it will still take some convincing for me to be sold on the new direction, but I am willing to step back and give it a chance and everyone else should do the same instead of being critics.
Last edited by Josh Murphy : 03-08-2008 at 22:04. |
|
#165
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New FIRST competition structure in Michigan
One thing to consider is not only about being able to complete your robot on time, its also about putting it together after you unpack your crate.
Teams who travel by ground have the luxury of carrying a greater no. of tools and accessories they need to bring to an event. Teams often roll their carts into the pit, whereas other teams are forced to put as much in their crate in order to alleviate what they have to carry on an airplane. This has caused us this season to take our arm apart. As much as it was a hastle this past season, we had no other choice. Our morning practice rounds were all shot because of it all of our events. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| California nad Michigan Schools Score First In Robotics Competition | Joe Matt | FIRST In the News... | 0 | 05-07-2005 17:43 |
| A New Concept for the Tournament Structure in 2004 | Andrew | Rules/Strategy | 38 | 07-07-2003 12:30 |
| West Michigan Robotics Competition | archiver | 1999 | 1 | 23-06-2002 23:00 |
| West Michigan Robotics Competition | archiver | 1999 | 1 | 23-06-2002 22:56 |
| West Michigan Robotics Competition | archiver | 2000 | 0 | 23-06-2002 22:33 |