Go to Post I am surprised at the relative conservative capability you described on our 2006 machine. As for the 2007 machine, in anticipation of an aquatic game, we have completed a robot that "walks on water" and are well along with one that can "part the sea". - Bill Beatty [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-08-2008, 04:34
dtengineering's Avatar
dtengineering dtengineering is offline
Teaching Teachers to Teach Tech
AKA: Jason Brett
no team (British Columbia FRC teams)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,827
dtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Question about worm gears

A team we saw in Portland in 2007 (I believe) had done up a standard 6wd system using worm gears and had calculated the relative efficiency of using a single worm gear vs. multiple spur gears. Their calculations showed that the two systems were comparable... if not equal, at least close enough that they chose to build the worm gearbox in hopes of achieving some anti-backdrive benefits to make them more resistant to pushing.

Now I know it would be really helpful if I could remember what team it was or where to find a picture of their robot... but perhaps someone will recognize the team I am talking about and post that info here.

I don't remember their drive system as being either devastatingly effective, or terribly problematic... I just remember it being cool because it was something different, and quite elegantly designed.

In many cases a 4cim drive has more power than a team actually needs most of the time and some teams have been quite effective with 2cims driving a 4wd or 6wd drive train. This suggests to me that if you try building a worm swerve you might come up with a cool system... perhaps not the ultimate in mechanical efficiency, but perhaps lighter and simpler than using bevel gears... and ultimately something a bit different, unique and kind of cool. So not to disagree with the concept that you lose some efficiency with a worm drive, but perhaps it is not prohibitive if you see the potential for benefits in other ways.

Jason
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Worm Gears chooKcha Technical Discussion 4 30-06-2007 18:12
Question on Attaching Hubless Gears lndnny Technical Discussion 4 25-01-2007 18:44
Worm Gears FIRST JerseyKid Technical Discussion 13 18-01-2006 10:13
Looking for nylon worm gears (~64 pitch) Travis Covington Technical Discussion 3 12-03-2004 22:30
spur gears & fishers ...newbie question... archiver 2001 3 23-06-2002 23:17


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi