|
|
|
 There's nothing wrong with the loader [dividing by zero], John just misses us 229'ers and wanted everyone to know :-P - Jay Trzaskos [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating: 
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
| There's nothing wrong with the loader [dividing by zero], John just misses us 229'ers and wanted everyone to know :-P - Jay Trzaskos [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#13
22-08-2008, 19:46
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Omnibot
why don't you use a three-wheel setup instead of a four-wheel setup?
correct me if i'm wrong but i think it would give you more stability and reduce your weight at the same time your only difficulty might be programming it with 0, 60, and 120 degrees instead of 0, 90, 180, and 270 degrees, but there are also less wheels to program i don't know how speed would be affected by the 3-wheel setup if i'm wrong in any areas please forgive me and ignore my comments 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: Omnibot | Ryan M. | Extra Discussion | 18 | 03-08-2005 08:19 |
Threaded Mode