chassis isolation, contrary to UL1740?

I think Team 45 is cloning Andy. Anybody who has pitted next to them should agree that they are first class students running a first class team. - IKE [more]

		Chief Delphi > Technical > Electrical
chassis isolation, contrary to UL1740?

Thread Tools

Rate Thread

Display Modes

#10

16-10-2008, 13:30

Russ Beavis Russ Beavis is offline

Registered User

no team

Join Date: Nov 2005

Location: Manchester, NH - DEKA R&D Corp.

Posts: 341

Russ Beavis has a reputation beyond repute

Re: chassis isolation, contrary to UL1740?

I probably should have included the following disclaimer in my above post -

I don't write the rules. It's possible that FIRST and the GDC may decide to require non-conductive mounting of the cRIO to fully avoid the issue.

Russ

« Previous Thread | Portal | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts vB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Chassis	Torboticsmember	General Forum	2	30-01-2008 16:30
Chassis info	Barak Shelef	Technical Discussion	2	07-01-2007 14:31
Contrary to popular opinion..."wedge" robots are out	David Brinza	Rules/Strategy	23	24-02-2006 09:42
Chassis?	jakey	Kit & Additional Hardware	1	09-01-2006 15:10
Chassis	ark_1230	Technical Discussion	2	04-09-2002 22:51

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:52.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.