|
|
|
 We are different, on purpose, for a reason. No one in FIRST should EVER forget that.
- Rich Kressly [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| We are different, on purpose, for a reason. No one in FIRST should EVER forget that.
- Rich Kressly [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#14
19-10-2008, 23:32
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: cRio external 'co-processor' options
Why are people concerned about not having a DHCP server? DHCP is not an integral part of the TCP/IP stack, and can be bypassed simply by configuring a static IP address. DHCP is only used to allow more flexibility in network topology.
My assumption would be that the cRio's access point NIC would be a DHCP client and the cRio's second NIC and the camera would have static, but configurable, IP addresses. Can any of the beta teams confirm this? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Future use of cRIO? | SL8 | Technical Discussion | 47 | 30-04-2008 13:18 |
| Co-Processor? | Guy Davidson | Programming | 14 | 19-11-2007 19:31 |
| Co-processor | whytheheckme | Programming | 5 | 24-02-2007 20:11 |
| Poll: Is your team using an external processor? | Eldarion | Programming | 15 | 10-02-2006 09:51 |
Threaded Mode