|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
[FTC]: parts that should have been made??
I think that the tetrix kit is lacking a few parts that you cant buy and would be beneficial to everyone. I think there should be long axles, 100mm is not long enough. Some kind of linear slide metal pieces and the flat strip of gear like vex had would be good. Also the tetrix angle metal should have the same hole pattern as the channel does. Omni wheels whould be a nice addition too. Anyone else have other parts they wish were made????
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: parts that should have been made??
Yea I agree that they should make omni wheels, my team is having issues designing good drive system without them.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: parts that should have been made??
By flat strip of gear, do you mean a rack? I would have appreciated a rack for a rack and pinion elevator. Some sliders would have been good for a scissor lift.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: parts that should have been made??
yeah i did mean a rack, i think. im pretty sure thats what it is.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: parts that should have been made??
I think that ...
1. Omni-Wheels would've been a good idea. 2. If we did have sliding metal, we wouldn't be allowed to use it. It's a challenge that FIRST presents. Notice in the rules, when VEX metal is mentioned, the linear slider pack is singled out and excluded. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: parts that should have been made??
i did notice in the rules that the linear slide from vex wasnt allowed but i still think it would have been a nice addition.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: parts that should have been made??
you can make items with the Al and the Polycarb. Don't worry too much about what didn't come in the kit. Worry about what you can do with the parts in the kit.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [FTC]: parts that should have been made??
The biggest weakness we've found so far is the split clamps. We have these monster gears and motors and no good way to tranfer the torque to the axles. It is very frustrating.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: parts that should have been made??
I think that the clamps are wierd, there should be longer exles, and there should be a way to to make sure that we don't have to rely on Lego parts if we are going to use the LEGO motors. The Lego gears and Tetrix gears don't even go together.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: parts that should have been made??
Three words... "Continuous Rotation Servos"
I miss them so ![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: parts that should have been made??
that would be motors. . I think that the tetrix kit should have weaker motors we could use. Just so that we're not vamping up on Drive motors. But I think the Lego motors are to...different than the tetrix to be *easily* adapted into the kit. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Simple things that have made your life better or easier | KenWittlief | Chit-Chat | 15 | 25-10-2005 06:16 |
| pic: Segways have been around longer that we've thought! | Erin Rapacki | Extra Discussion | 7 | 25-09-2005 21:56 |
| Should all three pneumatics pistons have been received? | Jordan A. | General Forum | 6 | 08-01-2002 13:48 |
| Should the stretcher have been used more? | Tom Fairchild | General Forum | 8 | 26-08-2001 02:40 |