|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 6wd chassis
1/4" thick is always more expensive because it is more material. In the age of bumpers, a properly supported 1/8" plate will more than stand up to the abuses of FIRST. If you want to increase the strength substantially without increasing weight by too much you could bend the plates on the top and bottom to create a flange. This will increase the stiffness of the plate dramatically.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 6wd chassis
Quote:
To paraphrase Ferris Bueller: "They are SO choice. If you have the means, I highly recommend adding a few." |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 6wd chassis
If you have the patience to dig through it, there are a number of examples on how the location of material affects the strength and stiffness of a beam in this thread. http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=67605
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 6wd chassis
it is 1/8" alluminum 5052 alloy, so it is harder and stronger then other alloys.
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 6wd chassis
Why not use 2024 or 7075 if your not welding anything to those pieces. 7075 sheets have a brinell of 150 and a yield of 65 ksi.
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 6wd chassis
Quote:
5052 is commonly used in sheet metal applications as it is much easier to bend and flange. Yes, 7075 is harder and has a higher yield strength.... but, good luck shaping it as easily as 5052. In fact, the low radius bends you see on most sheet metal parts in FIRST (148, 228, Kitbot frame) would probably crack 7075 rather than nicely bend it. |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 6wd chassis
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 6wd chassis
The next logical iteration in the design (supported by some recommendations by some knowledgeable people) would have been to flange it.
|
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 6wd chassis
Using 7075 or 7068 for the sideplates of a drivetrain is a total waste of money and complete overkill in my (not) so humble opinion. Tons of people have made similar designs with plain old 6061 and it works just fine.
It's always better to figure out why a design actually works and the best ways to implement it than to just assume upgrading to a "better" material will make everything work. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 6wd chassis
I completely agree with you cory. The only places where I see 7075 as having a noticeable impact on performance is on gears and shafts where strength is very important and there is a constant load working on the shaft. Adding flanges to the sideplates will increases the stiffness much more than just switching to 7075 aluminum. Also 7075 is very expensive stuff.
If anyone wants to see flanges, look at my last drivetrain I posted http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/32013? Last edited by sdcantrell56 : 10-11-2008 at 13:32. |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 6wd chassis
Quote:
And I agree with JVN here...flanges are an awesome way to strengthen something up and keep it light. |
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 6wd chassis
It would help to see some pics of this properly implemented.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: FRC1293 Prototype 6wd Chassis | Thermal | Extra Discussion | 16 | 06-01-2009 23:12 |
| 6WD Chassis Stiffness vs. Maneuverability | IKE | Technical Discussion | 35 | 07-12-2008 16:04 |
| pic: 6WD Design Iteration | Madison | Extra Discussion | 7 | 01-01-2008 14:00 |
| Need pictures of chassis for 6WD | team2061 | CAD | 6 | 24-12-2007 14:51 |
| pic: 6WD Module | Madison | Technical Discussion | 20 | 12-01-2007 10:09 |