|
|
|
 Anything worth analyzing is worth over-analyzing. And anything worth over-analyzing is worth hyper-analyzing. Ready, go! - Michael Hill [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| Anything worth analyzing is worth over-analyzing. And anything worth over-analyzing is worth hyper-analyzing. Ready, go! - Michael Hill [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
[FTC]: 35's Drive problem
We've been working on our robot for the past several weeks and we are about done with construction and programming. We are having a slight problem with our controls. Everything we tell the robot to do in teleop is delayed by about 1/2 a second. The arm is toned down enough that it's not that big of a deal, but the delay is making driving the base VERY difficult. We are using labview and we have applied all updates. Is anyone else having similar issues?
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [FTC]: Problem with two controller setup in Labview | wilsonmw04 | FIRST Tech Challenge | 2 | 11-11-2008 19:58 |
| [FTC]: First problem with FTC and LabView.....? | PhilBot | FIRST Tech Challenge | 5 | 07-11-2008 10:36 |
| [FTC]: Team 35's Servo Test | wilsonmw04 | FIRST Tech Challenge | 11 | 03-11-2008 21:47 |
| [FTC]: FTC Servo-Motor Problem with Labview | dnhansen | FIRST Tech Challenge | 1 | 26-10-2008 00:43 |
| pic: FTC 35's prototype for 2007 | wilsonmw04 | Extra Discussion | 2 | 08-11-2007 18:38 |
Threaded Mode