|
|
|
 See, another reason for going--you can find out your chances of being thrown off the field for a safety violation! - EricH [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| See, another reason for going--you can find out your chances of being thrown off the field for a safety violation! - EricH [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Enviornmental impact of the new system
A while ago it was announced to is that the reasoning behind only receiving one control system that is to be reused was to reduce the environmental impact (as said on Bill's Blog).
Looking at the new system, I can understand why it was packaged in a large box, that was necessary. I can understand why the joysticks have lots of packaging, FIRST doesn't control logitech. But why does the Jaguar need to come in a gigantic box? The one item we are most likely to be ordering repeats of year to year, and it has the most superfluous packaging. If the environmental impact was important FIRST, why didn't they ask Luminary Micro to use less, or no, packaging. I'm confused here, as something really contradicts. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CAD files for the new control system | vivek16 | CAD | 34 | 18-01-2009 11:56 |
| Early Shipment of the New Control System | EricVanWyk | FRC Control System | 3 | 05-11-2008 13:51 |
| Thoughts on the new Control System by a Beta Tester | dbeck103 | General Forum | 4 | 22-10-2008 18:49 |
| E- Stop and The New FRC Control System | Gdeaver | Technical Discussion | 15 | 09-10-2008 15:11 |
| QotW [11-03-03]: The Real Impact | Amanda Morrison | Rumor Mill | 14 | 06-11-2003 23:04 |
Threaded Mode