|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Problems with Victor 884
Victors are legal, but I believe you must change the code to the specific speed controller (and it's set to jaguars by default) as it generates a different PWM for each type.
|
|
#2
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Problems with Victor 884
Quote:
I'd guess that the problem is that the PWM cables aren't plugged in fully on the Victor. It can be quite difficult to get it in, because of the retaining features. |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Problems with Victor 884
Quote:
@trilogy2826 I will need to investigate into the jags further. Is it possible to make a tower of sorts out of two of them? I know you need a half inch clearance between them, but in order to fit them on we would need to do something along the lines of stacking to be able to have enough space. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Problems with Victor 884
I would not stack either type of speed control. The top of the fans on both types need to be free to move the cooling air over the power devices. The size of the Jaguar is a distinct downside to using these devices in comparison. Remember that in all electronics there is a point on the temperature curve where the device just starts to do what it wants. Sometimes to the point of self destruction.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Problems with Victor 884
do the jags have a feedback for speed so that you can sync all the motors to the same speed to make sure you go straight in auto.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Problems with Victor 884
Not till CANBUS next year.
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Problems with Victor 884
Quote:
Is there anything we can possibly put the jags over on a raised platform? Here is our electronics board (sorry for so so detail): http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/32126 |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Problems with Victor 884
Alex,
Normally I suggest that speed controllers be mounted near the motors they are controlling to minimize the wire runs. There is nothing in the picture to prevent you from using perf stock or a piece of lexan on the uprights across the back of the robot. Then you can mount the controllers vertically on that. Since the Jaguars have mounting holes in the sides, you can use threaded standoffs to elevate every other one and using the standoffs, rotate the elevated controllers 90 degrees to allow you to stagger them and fit more in the space. That way, no fans are occluded and the wiring is spaced out. Also, mounting the controllers so that they are front to back rather than side to side, works well too. This allows them to be mounted next to each other and touching. The wiring works better that way as well and the only drawback is getting the PWM cables attached. In your actual robot, don't forget to mark your wires and controllers. You can get 3M wire marking tape from Digikey. It is expensive (about $30 for a dispenser with all 10 EIA colors) but is well worth it when you are trouble shooting. Last edited by Al Skierkiewicz : 11-12-2008 at 09:44. |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Problems with Victor 884
Quote:
Stacking anything that tends to generate a lot of heat isn't always a good idea, but in some cases if you manage the heat other ways, it's not always fatal. One example is if it controls a small load, just a few Amps (and thus doesn't get that warm), another example is if there is natural or forced airflow that ensures good cooling. |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Problems with Victor 884
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Problems with Victor 884
It was an older one from a previous year.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Problems with victor blowing | JamesBrown | Electrical | 18 | 17-02-2008 20:36 |
| Victor 884 Problems | Team 135 | Electrical | 12 | 05-02-2008 13:24 |
| Victor 884 | Devo1098 | Electrical | 6 | 29-06-2007 07:51 |
| Victor 884 | Kevin Ray | General Forum | 25 | 28-01-2003 15:02 |
| Victor 884 | Gary Bonner | Technical Discussion | 4 | 14-01-2002 08:10 |