|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: CH Flight Stick Compatibility with 2009 System?
Quote:
To your second point, you'll also needs to add some resistors to the driver station. I believe this has been explained elsewhere. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: CH Flight Stick Compatibility with 2009 System?
Quote:
Man, I don't know where you are coming from. My team found some old CH's in a set of materials from a defunct team. I have to say the new sticks are better than the CH's or the white sticks by leaps and bounds. The return, sensitivity, hand feel and buttons make them superior, IMO. If it had three axises, we'd be all over it. We're going to try a Saitek Cyborg Gold for Mechanum control. It should be very enlightening. |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: CH Flight Stick Compatibility with 2009 System?
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: CH Flight Stick Compatibility with 2009 System?
Quote:
![]() |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: CH Flight Stick Compatibility with 2009 System?
Nope. We were surprised as well when we went to hook everything up during the beta test.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: CH Flight Stick Compatibility with 2009 System?
Just from my experiences with the old school CHs on a 6WD, I'd take them any day over the Kit joysticks. I know arm driving is a different story, but button placement isn't that important for a base driver, and the left throttle wheel is great for shifting with your thumb without disturbing the stick position. Maybe it's just how I held them.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: CH Flight Stick Compatibility with 2009 System?
I think the biggest complaint with the "old" stuff the joysticks don't auto center. But, either way I have a solution for everyone who wants to have a genuine USB HID CH Flightstick Build a HID USB Device
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: CH Flight Stick Compatibility with 2009 System?
Quote:
As to making an adapter for analog joysticks, remember that the pots in the joysticks don't work as voltage dividers, they work as variable resistances. Directly connecting the X-axis pin to an analog input isn't likely to work well. To get the pots to work linearly, you'll need to build a constant current power supply to draw approximately 50 micro-amps through the pot from 5V. You should be able to make one with a few resistors and transistors, but the point is that getting true linear response out of the joystick isn't going to be simple. Alternatively, you can create a sort of voltage divider out of it by jumping the joystick signal to ground through a resistor. The problem here is that you're not going to get a perfectly linear response from the joystick. I've attached a picture of what it'd look like with different resistor values. It gets more linear with higher resistance, but you end up with more noise and a reduced overall range you're reading from. With the 500K, you're reading from 4.166V to 5V. With 100K, it's 2.5V to 5V. This obviously reduces your resolution. The analog inputs are 10-bit, so a 100K resistor would knock you down to 9-bit resolution. A 200K resistor would put you a little over 8-bit resolution. Practically speaking, it'd make the most sense to bust open the Flightstick and see if you can re-wire the pots as voltage dividers. If you can't, then I'd recommend grabbing a copy of The Art of Electronics, or weaning yourself off the Flightsticks as best you can. Given the plethora of joysticks out there, I find it hard to believe you can't find one you like. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: CH Flight Stick Compatibility with 2009 System?
I can't imagine swapping the encoders from a USB HID stick to the CH flightsticks would be an unachievable task. FrankenSticks to the rescue.
On a side note, from the discussion thus far I am in the FlightStick camp. Whether or not the hassle of getting them to work reliably on the 09 controls is worth it is a different story. Last edited by Tom Bottiglieri : 17-12-2008 at 12:54. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: CH Flight Stick Compatibility with 2009 System?
You all know that CH makes USB flightsticks, right? The Flightsticks are almost certainly better than the Logitech ones - CH makes joysticks for "real" applications like controlling large machinery, planes, etc. Hence the somewhat hefty pricetag that they come with.
http://www.chproducts.com/retail/joysticks.html As indicated on their website, they don't require a driver and therefore do work with the DS. They also have some fancier sticks (FighterStick and CombatStick) which have extra buttons and a Z axis. |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: CH Flight Stick Compatibility with 2009 System?
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: CH Flight Stick Compatibility with 2009 System?
They are a bit goofy, but we used the gameport versions of those for a couple years on our robot ('05 and '06 I believe) with great success. We used them because we needed a few more buttons than the standard one offered. It might look a little funny but it worked well.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: CH Flight Stick Compatibility with 2009 System?
At least the new controllers provided are the closest thing we've seen in the KOP to the old CH flightsticks. The tightness of the movement is much better than the ones in recent years. Whoever wants the old ones, you can have ours. We'd be more than happy to give them away.
The flightsticks were about the only thing left that we kept recycling from old controllers from past robots. We still have 6 perfectly working ones left. ![]() |
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: CH Flight Stick Compatibility with 2009 System?
Dibs!
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Top Ten Things NOT to do with the 2009 FRC Control System | Vince | FRC Control System | 9 | 16-12-2008 17:08 |
| 2106's 2009 System Test | wilsonmw04 | Robot Showcase | 0 | 12-12-2008 23:23 |
| 2009 Control System | wedellm | FRC Control System | 11 | 23-11-2008 22:38 |
| Saitek X52 Flight Control System | Arkorobotics | Programming | 2 | 23-01-2007 18:34 |
| Flight Stick Clarification | archiver | 2001 | 2 | 23-06-2002 23:52 |