Go to Post oooh tight leather bumpers...sexy! - Nuttyman54 [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-12-2008, 12:00
Ed Law's Avatar
Ed Law Ed Law is offline
Registered User
no team (formerly with 2834)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Foster City, CA, USA
Posts: 752
Ed Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond repute
Need Clarification from 2008 Rule <R27>

We are a rookie team and we need help understanding this rule. Here is our situation. We bought a 2-speed AndyMark transmission with the original intent to put it together and "play" with it and maybe use it for 2009 season. Then I read this rule. My interpretation is that it can only be assembled during the build season or fix-it windows. I also understand that you can use it in future years as long as there is no modification and can still be considered a COTS item. I have read that teams reuse parts.

So this is what I don't understand. Does this mean that if a team buy something that is considered a COTS item during the off-season, assembled it and put it into their robot to learn how to do it, then they can not use this assembled COTS item on a competition robot? I thought we want to encourage students to learn.

Right now, our 2-speed AndyMark transmissions are sitting in a box not getting the attention they deserve. I guess I can not put it under the Christmas tree and open it to play with it until after Jan 3.

Ed


<R27>
Prior to the Kick-off: Before the formal start of the Robot Build Season, teams are encouraged to think as much as they please about their ROBOTS. They may develop prototypes, create proof-of-concept models, and conduct design exercises. Teams may gather all the raw stock materials and COTS COMPONENTS they want. But absolutely no fabrication or assembly of any elements intended for the final ROBOT is permitted prior to the Kick-off presentation.
__________________
Please don't call me Mr. Ed, I am not a talking horse.
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-12-2008, 12:10
Greg Needel's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Greg Needel Greg Needel is offline
REVving up for a new season
FRC #2848 (All-sparks)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,108
Greg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Need Clarification from 2008 Rule <R27>

The way that I would interpret this is that the gearbox as a whole is a COT as it is sold as a single item, regardless of the fact that it comes disassembled.

The assembly note in R27 deals with the assembly of more then one cots, or the assembly of raw/fabricated materials and cots. So if you were to assemble your AM shifters and put them on a test robot you would be fine to use them on your competition robot as long as they are placed on a new chassis and are un-modified as they are a single COT.
__________________
Greg Needel│www.robogreg.com
Co-founder REV Robotics LLC www.REVrobotics.com
2014 FRC World Champions with 254, 469, & 74
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-12-2008, 12:10
Pjohn1959's Avatar
Pjohn1959 Pjohn1959 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Paul W. Johnson
no team
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 543
Pjohn1959 has a reputation beyond reputePjohn1959 has a reputation beyond reputePjohn1959 has a reputation beyond reputePjohn1959 has a reputation beyond reputePjohn1959 has a reputation beyond reputePjohn1959 has a reputation beyond reputePjohn1959 has a reputation beyond reputePjohn1959 has a reputation beyond reputePjohn1959 has a reputation beyond reputePjohn1959 has a reputation beyond reputePjohn1959 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Need Clarification from 2008 Rule <R27>

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Law View Post
But absolutely no fabrication or assembly of any elements intended for the final ROBOT is permitted prior to the Kick-off presentation.
This is correct, however in you statement you said that you wanted to 'play' with it and "maybe" use it on this year's robot. If there is no intent on your part to have a completely fabricated model that will be definitely used on this years' robot, ( I don't know how this is even possible without knowing the games objective) then you may experiment with it.

Paul
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-12-2008, 12:14
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is online now
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,813
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Need Clarification from 2008 Rule <R27>

The AM trannies are COTS MECHANISMS. From the 2008 manual, Section 8.3 Definitions:
Quote:
COMPONENT – A ROBOT part in its most basic configuration, which can not be disassembled without damaging or destroying the part, or altering its fundamental function.[examples, including bolting a frame together]

MECHANISM – A COTS or custom assembly of COMPONENTS that provide specific functionality on the ROBOT. A MECHANISM can be disassembled (and then reassembled) into individual COMPONENTS without damage to the parts.
Unfortunately, your interpretation seems to be correct. (Note: If it isn't the correct one for the 2009 rules, then we'll both be highly annoyed.)

As for the reuse of parts: For certain parts, it is allowed under the 2008 rules (e.g. using the same two unmodified AM trannies would be legal, provided that they conform to all current rules). See 2008 <R26>.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-12-2008, 12:23
keen101's Avatar
keen101 keen101 is offline
Ubuntu Linux User
no team
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 228
keen101 is a jewel in the roughkeen101 is a jewel in the roughkeen101 is a jewel in the roughkeen101 is a jewel in the rough
Re: Need Clarification from 2008 Rule <R27>

I wouldn't worry about it. You are a rookie team. Anything you assemble could probably be considered prototype parts. If it were me, i'd have already built the transmissions, and be working on a prototype base welded together, and then just grab the first wheels i could find. Maybe two crappy caster wheels, and two chain and sprocket drive wheels mounted to the transmissions.

That rule has always been a little weird. To be honest i really don't know how a robot could be designed off season for the next competition. I suppose it could be done, but it would seem like a waste of time. Anything else built i consider prototype. That's just me maybe.

here are some tips i will give you:

1. don't use aluminum axles.
2. use some sort of cable ties to keep wiring organized (as best you can), and write down a "diagram" of where your wires go just in case.

3.Try to learn solidworks and draft almost every part of your robot before you build it. Just go thought the first 3 solidworks tutorials, and you will know the basics practically.

4.read as many rules as you can, and reread them later. sometimes you miss something, or understand it better later.

5. start building a crate at least two weeks before the shipping deadline.
6.make sure you have shipping info correct.
7.always have fun, but try not to goof around. both can be done if you try.
8.try to learn the areas you want to learn as best you can. read stuff that you think might not even be helpful, sometimes you find little tidbits that can really help.
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-12-2008, 12:33
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is online now
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,813
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Need Clarification from 2008 Rule <R27>

Quote:
Originally Posted by keen101 View Post
I wouldn't worry about it. You are a rookie team. Anything you assemble could probably be considered prototype parts. If it were me, i'd have already built the transmissions, and be working on a prototype base welded together, and then just grab the first wheels i could find. Maybe two crappy caster wheels, and two chain and sprocket drive wheels mounted to the transmissions.

That rule has always been a little weird. To be honest i really don't know how a robot could be designed off season for the next competition. I suppose it could be done, but it would seem like a waste of time. Anything else built i consider prototype. That's just me maybe.

here are some tips i will give you:

1. don't use aluminum axles.
2. use some sort of cable ties to keep wiring organized (as best you can), and write down a "diagram" of where your wires go just in case.

3.Try to learn solidworks and draft almost every part of your robot before you build it. Just go thought the first 3 solidworks tutorials, and you will know the basics practically.
The rule is there for a reason. The intent is that teams not work on their competition robots before the game. The GDC might decide, for no apparent reason, to ban pre-made shifting transmissions. Farfetched? Yes. Possible? Yes.

I believe that there were rumors at one point that teams were pre-building. The next time a new ruleset came out, there were significant changes that would ruin the prebuild.

You may be right about the prototype, but then you'd probably need to get another pair of transmissions to be sure you're strictly legal.

Now, about those tips: 3) could really be ANY CAD program. Inventor is included with participation. It's just about as easy as Solidworks.
2) any method of organizing wire. Wrapping it works, energy chain could be used. Just organize it and keep the runs as short as possible, especially if they're heavy gauge.
1) Aluminum axles can be used. However, you have to know what you are doing. There's different types (alloys) of aluminum, and some are more suited for axles than others. If you want to do the analysis to get the aluminum axles, go right ahead. If not, steel works.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-12-2008, 13:18
Ed Law's Avatar
Ed Law Ed Law is offline
Registered User
no team (formerly with 2834)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Foster City, CA, USA
Posts: 752
Ed Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Need Clarification from 2008 Rule <R27>

Thanks for the replies. I am getting conflicting opinions on this subject. I am sure this question was asked before. What was FIRST's official position on this? If veterans team can reuse a 2-speed transmission assembled together in previous years which was not modified, why can't a rookie team reuse a 2-speed transmission assembled together that was put into a prototype to learn how things work? The only difference is the time saved in assembly which is not much. But I can not afford to make them not legal and have to buy new ones. Does it mean if I disassemble them and put them back together after Jan 3 then it is okay? Very strange rules.

Ed
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-12-2008, 13:59
Taylor's Avatar
Taylor Taylor is offline
Professor of Thinkology, ThD
AKA: @taylorstem
FRC #3487 (Red Pride Robotics)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN, USA 46227
Posts: 4,599
Taylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Need Clarification from 2008 Rule <R27>

One possible solution - If you assemble the AndyMark shifters, play with them a bit, and after kickoff you alter them somehow (something as simple as drilling a hole somewhere), according to past years' rules you've got yourself a newly fabricated mechanism, which historically has been legal to use.
To echo what has been said by Mr. Lavery dozens of times, rules from past years' competitions do NOT necessarily carry over into future games.
Good luck with your rookie season - sounds like you're already off to a great start.
__________________
Hi!
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-12-2008, 14:11
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is online now
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,813
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Need Clarification from 2008 Rule <R27>

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Law View Post
Thanks for the replies. I am getting conflicting opinions on this subject. I am sure this question was asked before. What was FIRST's official position on this? If veterans team can reuse a 2-speed transmission assembled together in previous years which was not modified, why can't a rookie team reuse a 2-speed transmission assembled together that was put into a prototype to learn how things work? The only difference is the time saved in assembly which is not much. But I can not afford to make them not legal and have to buy new ones. Does it mean if I disassemble them and put them back together after Jan 3 then it is okay? Very strange rules.

Ed
The veterans did it during the build season (presumably) and it's a COTS item, which could under the 2008 rules be used if in unmodified condition, despite being used before.

I did a bit of digging through the 2008 and 2007 Q&As (as these particular rules haven't changed a whole lot since then). In 2007, the Q&A ruling was that COTS mechanisms are permitted, providing that they were unmodified. (Source: http://www.usfirst.org/uploadedFiles...007-Export.pdf, page73, rulings on what was then <R17>)

You're right, the rules in that section are strange. The timeline rules are perhaps the strangest, but the most necessary.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-12-2008, 14:55
Matt C's Avatar
Matt C Matt C is offline
Registered User
FRC #1468 (J-Birds)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Islip Terrace, NY
Posts: 396
Matt C has a reputation beyond reputeMatt C has a reputation beyond reputeMatt C has a reputation beyond reputeMatt C has a reputation beyond reputeMatt C has a reputation beyond reputeMatt C has a reputation beyond reputeMatt C has a reputation beyond reputeMatt C has a reputation beyond reputeMatt C has a reputation beyond reputeMatt C has a reputation beyond reputeMatt C has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Matt C
Re: Need Clarification from 2008 Rule <R27>

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Needel View Post
The way that I would interpret this is that the gearbox as a whole is a COT as it is sold as a single item, regardless of the fact that it comes disassembled.

The assembly note in R27 deals with the assembly of more then one cots, or the assembly of raw/fabricated materials and cots. So if you were to assemble your AM shifters and put them on a test robot you would be fine to use them on your competition robot as long as they are placed on a new chassis and are un-modified as they are a single COT.

FYI: COTS stands for Commercial Off The Shelf, it is not plural and can't be referred to as something.

IE:
Items available from commercial suppliers are COTS items.
An item available from a commercial supplier is a COTS item.

I appologize for being a stickler, but I give the folks I work with a hard time when they do this as well.
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-12-2008, 15:17
keen101's Avatar
keen101 keen101 is offline
Ubuntu Linux User
no team
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 228
keen101 is a jewel in the roughkeen101 is a jewel in the roughkeen101 is a jewel in the roughkeen101 is a jewel in the rough
Re: Need Clarification from 2008 Rule <R27>

It's a very ambiguous rule, which in my opinion can have multiple answers.


I say, go for it, but that's just me. If it were me, I'd just do it because in my mind a COTS item like that cannot be prohibited.


What really defines a pre-made robot?

I know team 159 makes a chassis every year of the same default configuration based on a robot they designed 5 years ago. I don't think this rule prevents them from doing that.

I really don't know, like i said it's very ambiguous.
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-12-2008, 20:15
IndySam's Avatar
IndySam IndySam is online now
Registered User
FRC #0829 (Digital Goats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Indy
Posts: 3,361
IndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Need Clarification from 2008 Rule <R27>

Like all rules I think you have to look at the intent of the GDC.

The rule is intended to prevent pre-building not pre-season experimentation. If you would modify this trans then you would not be allowed to use it. You could not use any fabricated parts that you made during your experimentation to use with this trans.
__________________
"Champions are champions not because they do anything extraordinary but because they do the ordinary things better than anyone else." —Chuck Knoll


2015 Indianapolis District Winner
2014 Boilermaker Regional Industrial Design Award
2013 Smoky Mountain Regional Industrial Design Award
2012 Boilermaker Engineering Excellence Award
2010 Boilermaker Rockwell Innovation in Control Award.
2009 Buckeye J&J Gracious Professionalism Award
2009 Boilermaker J&J Gracious Professionalism Award
2008 Boilermaker J&J Gracious Professionalism Award
2007 St Louis Regional Winners
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-12-2008, 08:39
Betty_Krocker Betty_Krocker is offline
Fabricator/Hacker/Comic Relief
AKA: Michael
FRC #2028 (Phantom Robotics)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Hampton, VA
Posts: 105
Betty_Krocker is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to Betty_Krocker Send a message via Yahoo to Betty_Krocker
Re: Need Clarification from 2008 Rule <R27>

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH View Post
The rule is there for a reason. The intent is that teams not work on their competition robots before the game. The GDC might decide, for no apparent reason, to ban pre-made shifting transmissions. Farfetched? Yes. Possible? Yes.

I believe that there were rumors at one point that teams were pre-building. The next time a new ruleset came out, there were significant changes that would ruin the prebuild.

You may be right about the prototype, but then you'd probably need to get another pair of transmissions to be sure you're strictly legal.

Now, about those tips: 3) could really be ANY CAD program. Inventor is included with participation. It's just about as easy as Solidworks.
2) any method of organizing wire. Wrapping it works, energy chain could be used. Just organize it and keep the runs as short as possible, especially if they're heavy gauge.
1) Aluminum axles can be used. However, you have to know what you are doing. There's different types (alloys) of aluminum, and some are more suited for axles than others. If you want to do the analysis to get the aluminum axles, go right ahead. If not, steel works.

Right but if they were just playing with it and it HAPPENED to end up on the robot, then they are good. The word INTENDED is the key word in this rule and intent is hard to prove, so you are fine...
__________________
"Measure once, cut twice... wait... what?"

"Two things needed to build a robot.. WD40 for the things that don't move but should, and Duct tape for the things that move but shouldn't"


  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-12-2008, 10:23
Matt C's Avatar
Matt C Matt C is offline
Registered User
FRC #1468 (J-Birds)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Islip Terrace, NY
Posts: 396
Matt C has a reputation beyond reputeMatt C has a reputation beyond reputeMatt C has a reputation beyond reputeMatt C has a reputation beyond reputeMatt C has a reputation beyond reputeMatt C has a reputation beyond reputeMatt C has a reputation beyond reputeMatt C has a reputation beyond reputeMatt C has a reputation beyond reputeMatt C has a reputation beyond reputeMatt C has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Matt C
Re: Need Clarification from 2008 Rule <R27>

Quote:
Originally Posted by Betty_Krocker View Post
Right but if they were just playing with it and it HAPPENED to end up on the robot, then they are good. The word INTENDED is the key word in this rule and intent is hard to prove, so you are fine...
I think you are reading too much into the rule.

I believe the reason behind the rule was to reduce recurring costs to teams by allowing reuse of items that could be re-purchased in the same configuration. (given the newfound availability of what were once "custom parts" from companies such as Andy Mark)

You were allowed to re-use transmissions from Andy Mark as long as they are not modified and still available commercially as of kickoff. (UNDER LAST YEAR'S RULES)

Assembled/not assembled . . doesn't really matter(though I guess technically you would need to return them to their "out of the box configuration" then reassemble/recalibrate."
Customized/"non-standard" parts . . that does matter (they would have to be returned to their stock condition and remodified)

Commercial parts are commercial parts are commercial parts.
As long as they are still in their "off the shelf" configuration, you are fine.

Again, this is to last year's rules, but I don't really see them changing much regarding this issue.
Given that kickoff is as close as it is, you might as well keep them tucked away until you can install them on your kitbot for use on the actual robot.

Last edited by Matt C : 19-12-2008 at 10:26.
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-12-2008, 10:40
JesseK's Avatar
JesseK JesseK is offline
Expert Flybot Crasher
FRC #1885 (ILITE)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 3,695
JesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Need Clarification from 2008 Rule <R27>

Think about common sense for a sec. Then take a deep breath.

I would play with the transmission. You need to learn what kinks there are in it so you can plan to work them out. You can also play with what the current speeds of the transmission 'feel' like so the driver has a better feel for driving the bot. These are all allowed and intended to be allowed during the preseason. As you can see on the forums, many teams already have drivable robots with the new control system on it. Speaking of which, doing so also allows you to experiment with pneumatic and servo control in the new control system.

Then disassemble and reassemble it during the build season. While it's apart, you'll have ample time to figure out how to solve any problems you encountered during testing. Note that if you modify anything, Eric has already pointed out that you'll have to get a new one of those things next year -- not necessarily the whole transmission...common sense seems to dictate the intent of the rule here. As an example, this offseason we had to file down a roll pin on the dog gear because it was hitting an output stage gear. In the build season, should we choose to use the same transmissions, we will modify a 2007 KOP transmission roll pin in the same manner and reassemble the transmission it goes in. We already had the intent to rebuild the transmission Jan 3rd anyways so that we could replace bearings and properly lubricate the gears.

I'd also like to note that our AM super shifters came fully assembled last year; so I believe the whole argument for assembled vs dissembled COTS product usage has controvertible evidence either way.

In the end, it will be the 2009 rules that state whether or not we may be able to use previous years' COTS components.
__________________

Drive Coach, 1885 (2007-present)
CAD Library Updated 5/1/16 - 2016 Curie/Carver Industrial Design Winner
GitHub
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Little Help with Rule Clarification Windwarrior Website Design/Showcase 1 13-02-2008 15:38
New rule Clarification changes plans BoyWithCape195 General Forum 83 07-02-2006 20:34
[OCCRA]: Rule Clarification Viking(redneck) OCCRA 3 24-11-2004 09:41
Very Important Rule Clarification!!! Mr. Mac OCCRA 0 17-10-2002 23:35
IMPORTANT RULE ADDITION AND CLARIFICATION Mike McIntyre OCCRA 0 03-12-2001 22:17


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 21:11.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi