|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 80/20 chassis
As previously mentioned 80-20 does have many different fasteners that do come in handy such as
![]() which was used to attach a solenoid to it & ![]() which we used to connect two pieces at 90 degrees this is our 80-20 that we used ![]() |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 80/20 chassis
When I was on 100 we used 1010 80/20 in 2003 and 2004. Didn't have any strength problems.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 80/20 chassis
Foot for foot, 80/20 aluminum isn't that much heavier than 1x1x0.0625-wall extrusion. The biggest weight difference is in the fasteners -- to stiffen the 80/20 frame, make sure you allocate enough of your weight budget for plenty of bolts. This year our lift overran it's original weight calculation by ~15% due to extra nuts/bolts that were added at the base.
We used 80/20 for our lift in 2008 and noticed severe torsional forces when the lift was high and everything was under stress. That said, I'll echo MOE's comments that the frame needs to be stiffened at the end of every match. Another option is to sandblast/clean off the outer coating, and weld it. Usually a local machine shop is willing to donate an hour for this if you time it correctly and plan in advance. Welding would significantly improve the stiffness of the frame. Even better, you could take a 80/20 'jig' in, bolt the frame to the jig, then the welders would have plenty of room to weld the frame joints together without worrying about having to lay out your frame, or warping as the frame cools. |
|
#4
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: 80/20 chassis
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 80/20 chassis
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 80/20 chassis
I once had a job assembling 8020 structures for a distributor and have used it since then on many other projects. We also built a robot out of it back in 2002 so i feel i speak from experience.
8020 Pros: You can very quickly prototype things and move them around. It doesn't need welding which is a huge plus if you don't have good access to a TIG welder. This and the fact that we got it for free were the reasons we used ut. If you want to be able to move things around then use brackets or anchor fastners. Keep in mind the weight of brackets. If you want something thats strong and don't plan on moving it use end fasteners. Even if your not making a frame out of 8020 they make some very nice parts that come in handy. For a FIRST robot frame i would reccomend 10 series if you are designing in inches or 25 series if you are metric. 15 series or 40 series is overkill. 8020 is a great material and certianly makes for flexibility. In a fast paced design challenge like FIRST this is useful. 8020 Cons: An 8020 Structure will be both heavier and more expensive than an equivilant welded structure from square or round. You have less freedom with wall thicknesses and there is a lot of mass concentrated in the center of the profile which does little for stiffness. It is particularly week in torsion. Keep in mind the weight the fasteners add. Drop in T-nuts are your friend. get plenty of these. If you plan on using end fastners , get the jig so that you can drill the clearance holes painlessly. Thre is a fixture for milling the holes for anchor fasners but you don't really need it. Make sure you have a few ball allen wrenches in the appropriate size. Also there are some older threads about this topic if you dig em up with the search |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Chassis | Torboticsmember | General Forum | 2 | 30-01-2008 16:30 |
| autocad chassis | kDude | CAD | 7 | 16-01-2008 10:07 |
| Chassis Materials | neoshaakti | Technical Discussion | 30 | 12-11-2007 21:08 |
| Chassis? | jakey | Kit & Additional Hardware | 1 | 09-01-2006 15:10 |
| Chassis | ark_1230 | Technical Discussion | 2 | 04-09-2002 22:51 |